Skip to content

David Hewitt

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hewitt commented  · 

    Update. After I tied the higher-seed team in the semi-finals, he went on to win the League Championship. The Consolation Game for 3rd Place, I tied the team who finished 1st Place during the regular season. I won 5 stand-alone categories, my opponent won 3 stand-alone categories, but we tied in ERA and Saves. I held my breath overnight to see how this was going to turn out and to my amazement, I won 3rd Place, 5 to 3. The two category ties must have been thrown out??! Maybe this should be the new playoff rules, if during a playoff game their is a tie, throw the tie category(ies) out and give the win to the most deserving team, not the higher seed!!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hewitt commented  · 

    I know what you are saying and I know what the playoff rules say, but I don't have to agree with the rules. I might be wrong, but if this was a regular season game my record on this would be
    5-4-1 and my opponents would be 4-5-1. So why confuse things by letting my opponent win with an asterick! I suppose if the tied category would have been Wins, then I still would have lost! I may reconsider my yahoo Fantasy Baseball for another Fantasy Baseball that has different rules, next year!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hewitt commented  · 

    League number: 96535. Team name: LV Knucklebusters. Thank you for taking a look!!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hewitt commented  · 

    Just recently, I lost a tie playoff game being a 3rd place regular season finisher facing a 2nd place finisher. I had 5 stand alone category points and a tie in WHIP. My opponent had 4 stand alone category points and a tie in WHIP with me, of course. Now if you break it down in detail my opponent had est. 1.2110000 and I had est. 1.2109000. So in Yahoo rules my opponent wins!???

    OK now if I had 5 stand alone category points and my opponent had 4, but we tie in Wins (pitcher cat) then I win!?? What I can't see is what is the difference? I believe I won both examples!!

    I strongly believe that this rule needs to be examined and adjusted!!! I do not have faith in Yahoo changing this, however I believe I have a strong argument. Please reply to my email on this. Thank you.

    David Hewitt supported this idea  · 
  2. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hewitt commented  · 

    I would be in favor of changing the Wins Category to " Wins and Quality Starts". An example would be a pitcher (SP) has pitched 7 innings, 7 K's, 4 Hits, 0 Walks & 1 Run, let say, with his team leading with a score of 2 to 1. Then the relief pitcher(s) allow 2 runs making a final score 3-2 and the starting pitcher receives no win even thou he had a quality start, the way things are now. Lets receive credit where credit is due for a good starting pitcher. A relief pitcher receiving a Win just because the offense scores runs on both sides to allow the score to be 5-3, reflecting another twist to the 1st example, and the RP may only pitch 1 inning getting the Win instead. Starting Pitchers should get credit for all Quality Starts.

    David Hewitt supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base