No matter what, allow us to choose which version of Yahoo Mail to use, whether it be an updated version (desired or undesired). In this case the "new version" is more complicated than the older version, harder to read and absolutely NOT necessary/ By deleting the older versions from being reverted to, you're negating the simplicity of them. Sometimes "newer" is NOT always "better" but worse and more cumbersome. At least allow us to make the choice to "upgrade" to the "newer, better version". The "newer, better version" may have more bells and whistles, but certainly isn't "newer or better" than an older version to most. Give us the opportunity to at least make the choice as to whet her accept or reject the "newer, better"? choice. Or at least keep the choice that we are familiar and comfortable with. This "new/better" version is in reality a piece of bovine excrement!!!!
Anonymous
No matter what, allow us to choose which version of Yahoo Mail to use, whether it be an updated version (desired or undesired). In this case the "new version" is more complicated than the older version, harder to read and absolutely NOT necessary/ By deleting the older versions from being reverted to, you're negating the simplicity of them. Sometimes "newer" is NOT always "better" but worse and more cumbersome. At least allow us to make the choice to "upgrade" to the "newer, better version". The "newer, better version" may have more bells and whistles, but certainly isn't "newer or better" than an older version to most. Give us the opportunity to at least make the choice as to whet her accept or reject the "newer, better"? choice. Or at least keep the choice that we are familiar and comfortable with. This "new/better" version is in reality a piece of bovine excrement!!!!