Scoring - Maximum Innings Pitched option for Head-to-head leagues
Requests to add maximum innings pitched requirements for H2H leagues. Currently, this feature isn't supported in H2H leagues.
Adminjpaine
(Admin, Yahoo)
shared this idea
-
Anonymous
commented
Another idea could be that pitchers cannot be used on the week that they are added. Not an ideal situation i agree, but streaming SP's is not within the spirit of the game
-
Anonymous
commented
Or limit the amount of adds per week. I don't stream pitchers (actually doing better than managers who do in my league), and I think the most adds in a week I've had is 4. The issue with limiting starts per week is that if someone decides to weight their roster more to SPs (without streaming) then they would be limited. Weighting your roster does reflect real life as some teams have like 6 SPs and a large bull pen; at the expense of backups for their IF/OF.
-
Anonymous
commented
I certainly understand your point. However if people want to sacrifice their ERA & WHIP by bringing in sub standard pitching let them continue to do so. My pitching in all my teams is pretty dominant most of the time and although occasionally those who roll in pitchers are successful, in general its usually detrimental to them
-
Tyler
commented
Yes!! And make this a weekly option as well please! Weekly starts limits in H2H Points Leagues are an ABSOLUTE must-have. Not to be that guy, but I am seriously shocked that it is not already an option. Why would you not stream at least one pitcher everyday of the week? A negative point start is pretty rare.
-
Eric
commented
There's a lot of differing opinion on whether or not you'd want a limit on starts or innings pitched.
That said, even if you didn't like the limit, I think Yahoo should make it available as an option and then it'd be up to your commissioner whether to enforce it or not. It's such a basic addition and there's so much demand, that I think we deserve the option.
-
Sean Queen
commented
One answer to this... stop playing 6 team leagues!
If you play in leagues with depth you dont have tjat issue.
Leagues with depth allow you to run up as many starts as you want. Ecen if you were a Vegas odds maker you will still find it hard to find quality starts in a 16+ team leagues.
Sorry guys but this is more about theleagues you are playing.
-
Joe
commented
i dont understand why yahoo feels its in the games' best interest to limit the amount of success a pitcher has. a pitcher goes into a game to do what? generate outs. Placing a limit on how many outs (3 outs = 1 IP) your pitching staff gets over the course of a season is a pretty dumb idea. it penalizes pitchers that go deeper in to games, as they take up more of your innings limit. ITS A CONTRADICTION to the game. OK my rant is over for today
-
Joe
commented
ive been trying to get this point across to yahoo for two years now. Standard on ESPN and other sites. i've been manually tracking games started for pitchers and its a ridiculous hassle.
1) make this an option
or
2) in the "team log" page have "Games Started" a header so it can be easily tracked.
or
3) one of my league-mates is a developer and offered to add the code necessary to do it himself if you provide him a couple hours of access -
Matt Stupp
commented
For example, my league (straight points) is set up for a 5-man rotation, with three relief spots. I'd like to set it up with a 162 Games Started limit and a ~400 Games limit. This would be much better than using the current 1375 Innings Limit.
-
Matt Stupp
commented
Using an Innings Limit is extremely crude. There NEEDS to be a "Games Started" and "Games" limit. Points generated by a pitcher who starts a game after the Games Started limit has been reached should be negated. Points generated by a pitcher who appears in a game after the Games limit has been reached should be negated. Similar to the way it's done with batters. Innings limits unfairly punish good pitchers and go against the spirit of the game.
-
Dan
commented
Percentage of stranded baserunners is an interesting idea, but it would only be appropriate for a "fantasy point" scoring system, where that stat was worth, say, 0.1 points and a homerun was worth way more than that.
-
Dan
commented
Remember, you do that, and you devalue the other stats. Do you want "scoreless relief appearances" being just as important as homeruns or wins? Plus the scoreless relief appearance is already included in lowering ERA.. a lot of these other categories create double counting
-
Jeff Miller
commented
I don't see how these would be overkill or redundant. Most of these stats are averaging stats as opposed to counting stats which are an improvement as far as pitching is concerned since week to week innings pitched is so volatile. Also, scoreless relief appearances reward overall performance opposed to a game situation that has noting to do with the pitcher actually accumulating the stat. What's wrong with giving leagues the additional options if they might be interested?
-
j
commented
overkill and redundant.
-
Josh
commented
Someone gets an extra 30 innings every year. Completely ruins the competitive race. Can you make it so the out points stop at the limit?
-
Jim Timberlake
commented
YES.. Games Played at 162 and Games Started at 162 is Perfect. And one reliever and you have the perfect game.
-
Zac
commented
Yes, you need a SP games started limit, otherwise teams will abuse this in daily H2H leagues. Even if you limit the number of transactions, they can still draft all pitching as bench slots and sub pitchers daily. I can't conceive how Yahoo does not already have this.
A max allowable roster position of certain positions would also remedy this situation.
-
anthony
commented
YAHOO PLEASE ALLOWS US TO SET STARTING PITCHING GAMES AND RELIEF PITCHING GAMES LIMIT!!!!!!!!
-
Tim
commented
As a member of cmohuskies21's league, I fully support the addition of these stats. They seem to be excellent indicators of a pitcher's overall skill, and also neatly complement stats that are already offered on the hitting side of things. If you have OPS for hitters it makes little sense not to have OPS against for pitchers. If there can only be a limited number of categories it would make sense to do away with one of the less useful or infrequently occurring categories (perfect games?) and replace it with OPS against.
-
cmo21huskies
commented
Our league would like to use OPS against as a pitching category in our root league. Michael Salfino writes great articles describing how OPS can be used as a barometer of pitcher performance. Our league is looking to set up a 6x6 roto league using the traditional 5x5 categories and adding OPS for hitters and OPS against for pitchers. We feel like this is a great format and if OPS is a great indicator of hitter performance we feel that OPS against for pitching should be an equally great indicator of pitcher performance.