[Private Leagues] IL+ Removal Feedback
General feedback for the removal of the IL+ roster spot in Private Leagues.
-
Kalson Jang
commented
Every league I'm in thinks your IL rules suck. IL+ and IL were different and each served a purpose. Should have kept both.
In today's league where everyone takes time off and gets injured all the time, IL+ was helpful to stream guys as soon as they were questionable.
Also, if a player is OUT, they should STAY OUT until they play again OR until there is news that actually makes the questionable. What makes them questionable after players process at night? NOTHING CHANGED, they're still as injured as they were when they missed the game hours ago. Until I see news that says otherwise, they should remain "Out" so I can keep streaming guys in their place.
-
Alex P
commented
bring back the option to have IL+, if people want to use it then it should be allowed. Don't remove it compeltely
-
Jason Buckle
commented
This new system is completely unreliable for the amount of injuries prevalent in the NBA. Players are being listed as questionable when they are guaranteed out to anyone with a brain and we cannot make quick pick ups in response because we're at the mercy of your admins or AI or whatever is in charge of determining what player gets an IL tag
-
Peter Lee
commented
A player that has missed a game as "Out" should not have this designation changed until an official injury report has been released that indicates otherwise. This would make it more transparent.
-
Perry Ozols
commented
Yahoo's new approack to the IL slot in incredibly restrictive.
You change the IL player's status back to "D", "Q", or "P", EVERY SINGLE DAY, irrespective as to whether the injury may be long-term.
When this occirs, you're precluded from making any transactions whatsoever on your non-IL players.Before, you kept the player's status as "IL" until the next time the player actually played a game upon return from whatever injury they had.
Essentially, a USELESS feature now...Not sure what the reasoning for the change could possibly be but, needless to say, NOT HAPPY!
-
Min Kim
commented
My suggestion is that P/Q/D players on IL is not invalid, only adding P/Q/D players to IL is invalid. I understand many players were taking advantage of the IL+ situation, but have one's roster frozen and not be able to make any transactions because of a P/Q/D player is unfair.
-
Patrick Geronimo
commented
After the player is out for the particular game, from the Out tag it gets to be Questionable which is not eligible anymore to the IL slot. Why change the O to Q status when that player has no game the next day? It would be better to stay it as O then changing to P/Q/D on the game day itself.
-
Henry Tupper
commented
If you want to disable IL+ do not change player designations on a whim. Do not change a players out status until the injury report for the next game is released. This leaves players in deadlock because as soon as someone gets put into doubtful or questionable the players lineup becomes locked. This is a serious issue that needs to be fixed asap!!!
-
Furkan Çaybaşı
commented
Bring back IL+ or increase the IL to be used by at least doubtful.
-
michael payton
commented
Can you make the doubtful IR eligible that means there's a 1 percent chance the player plays. I've seen my guy walk out on crutches why is he still doubtful?
-
Allan Cheung
commented
We need to have IL+ back, randomly waiting for player tags to change to out just to slot into IL means we waste time where other players can pick up on injured player's replacements.
-
Juxie Mahilum
commented
Atleast make the doubtful players be allowed to put in the IL slot since they are highly unlikely to play the game. At least make this changes to make the league experience a little bit better while maintaining fairness in waiver wire strategy.
-
Micky Cuccovia
commented
the new system is not working at all, j dub twisted his foot off and hes listed as doubtful
-
Spencer Hodgins
commented
The current IL system, in theory, is an improvement to the IL+ system from before, but in practice, it is insanely frustrating. Players are too quickly removed from the out tag, and the constant uncertainty of starts in the league makes it insanely difficult to handle injuries if you're not keeping an eye on it 24/7.
For example, if a player is questionable for a game, you have to wait until the confirmation. But if that confirmation does not happen until an hour before game time, it is very likely that you miss it. Normally that's annoying, but manageable; however, because they are almost immediately removed as "out" after the game, you can not make up for that missed game by streaming a player in the next day. Therefore, if you are not checking every questionable player right before their game time, streaming becomes almost impossible for short-term injuries.
A clear solution to this would be to treat "outs" as the "ing" tag had previously, where players remain tagged as "out" until they are confirmed to be returning, but any adjustments would be greatly appreciated.
-
Kenneth Fok
commented
Do NOT UPDATE the player injury status from Out to Questionable WITHOUT an official NBA team report saying otherwise please!!!!
-
Eamonn Nung
commented
If the player was injured and did not even play, you should never put them to Q!!!
Before when we are still using the IL system, the IL would only be removed when the player confirms they are playing. Right now you are simply changing all injured players status to Q after the missing game, and causing people completely cannot pick anyone from the FA!!!Please change back, or I will pursuade people changing to ESPN fantasy!!!
-
Diogo Pinto
commented
Some things are really tough for me to understand… doesn’t your Developers and people that work on the yahoo Fantasy basketball app actually use the app? Because it is pretty obvious to me that if they do play, it would be impossible to consider positive the changes that they did this season. Ive been playing Fantasy Basket on Yahoo for years and years and always said it was by far the best Fantasy app out there but sudenly you just destroyed it. I don’t really care about UI changes to be honest, but the removal of IL+ is a catastrophe. How on earth could you guys think it would be a good ideia to completely remove it? And how is it possible, that with all the terrible feedback you’re receiving about that, you still haven’t add it back? It shouldn’t be that difficut to add something that you add before and would for sure calm down your user base. If you can’t really add it back again for some reason, at least stop changing players that are out to questionable or other tags untill they actually come back and play, that’s the basics of the game really. If anything doesn’t change soon, unfortunately I Will have to take all my 5 leagues to other platform cause it is impossible to continue in a platform with gaps as big as these
-
jarrod black
commented
The new userface is very hard to scroll to see stats.
Also I can’t add anyone when a player is ruled out and then immediately listed as questionable after the game
-
Thomas Worrell
commented
The current rules are untenable. Coby white was changed from “out” to questionable just long enough to prevent me from making any waiver claims last night. You need to make it so players already on IL don’t lock your team until they are back. So if they change to doubtful, questionable or even probable they can stay in your IL and not lock your team.
-
Daniel Cwiekowski
commented
New injury designations are trash. I agreed that under the old system, when a player was probable or questionable and being able to stash them on IL knowing they'll play did not make any sense. However if a player is doubtful, they should be eligible for IL. Also, if a player does not play for multiple games and then randomly goes questionable, they should remain IL eligible until they actually play a game.