Skip to content

How can we make Fantasy Hockey better?

← Fantasy Hockey

Rosters - Position eligibility requests 2024-25

Position eligibility requests for the 2024-25 season.

We will continue evaluating players for new positions going forward and make updates where appropriate.

Full list of updated players for the 23/24 season: https://hockey.fantasysports.yahoo.com/hockey/playerchanges?type=pos

As of 10/4/23, we added the option for Commissioners to award position eligibility to players that haven't earned it by Yahoo Fantasy's standards yet. Keep in mind, this tool will only allow commissioners to add positions, not edit or remove them and you won't be able to assign Forwards or Defensemen with Goalie eligibility and vice versa. Commissioners can add new positions using the steps here: https://help.yahoo.com/kb/position-eligibility-fantasy-hockey-sln7057.html

4th ranked

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We’ll send you updates on this idea

Product Support shared this idea  ·   ·  Report…  ·  Admin →
How important is this to you?

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close
Submitting...
An error occurred while saving the comment
  • Jay Black commented  ·   ·  Report

    Josh Norris returns tonight from shoulder injury. Coach DJ Smith has stated specifically that they are lining him with Claude Giroux who is going to take faceoffs and Norris will slot over at RW in order to keep pressure off of him returning after a long absence. Norris should get RW eligibility as he will be sharing that as well as C responsibility with Giroux.

  • Ryan Hayward commented  ·   ·  Report

    Huberdeau has been playing at RW for a month. Should have LW/RW eligibility.

  • Jay Black commented  ·   ·  Report

    Nathan MacKinnon is slotting at RW with Evan Rodrigues taking faceoffs at points throughout the game since the line of Lehkonen-Rodrigues-MacKinnon was put together several games ago. Please adjust his position accordingly.

  • Jim Piasecki commented  ·   ·  Report

    Alex DeBrincat needs RW eligibility. Not only has he been playing RW on Ottawa's top line, Yahoo even has him listed as RW(1) in the player research tab.

  • Jed Fenton commented  ·   ·  Report

    Making players like Tage Thompson eligible for wing requires roope hintz to become eligible. This is no longer making sense on your part.

  • Jay Black commented  ·   ·  Report

    Nathan MacKinnon as RW, over the past 10 games he has consistently lined up as a RW during that span and at least 5% lines to the right of Rodrigues. A significant amount of Faceoffs he is on the wing and should be eligible as such

  • logan Adams commented  ·   ·  Report

    What's the reasoning why this dude isn't being assigned the RW eligibility? If you watch the actual games you can see how is more a RW than a C. The duo designation is far more appropriate than what I've seen of others, the due diligence should be done by now.

  • Bt Z commented  ·   ·  Report

    Please assign Roope Hintz C,RW.
    He alternates playing RW and C with Pavelski, who takes more faceoffs than Hintz does.

  • Joe Pieracci commented  ·   ·  Report

    Mittelstadt from Buffalo plays wing: add LW please

  • Justin X commented  ·   ·  Report

    Roope Hintz consistently plays both C and RW, yet continues to only have C eligibility. Hintz and Pavelski frequently switch positions not only during faceoffs, but also during play in which Hintz will go RW along the boards with Pavelski going net front as a C would do. Per that example which happens often in each Stars game, Hintz should have the same C/RW designations as his linemate Pavelski. Thank you.

  • Dominik Schimon commented  ·   ·  Report

    Colton Sissons RW
    plays on the right wing for a month. That's equivalent of 15 games based on their schedule

1 2 … 20 22 24 … 40 41

Fantasy Hockey: Position Eligibility

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)