Finance B3
151 results found
-
Could you please go back to the old charts or at least give the option to
The new layout is beyond unusable. Yahoo finance use to be my go-to tool to view the market. I can't stand looking at it now.
1st ranked -
Do not waste users precious time of accepting the new version. The new version has thousands of thousands bugs and not capable of serving
Bring back the classic version to users as an option . The new version is nor matured and/or designed well to serve users.
1. unable to scale all the indicators properly,
2. screens shaking ,
3. can not move the graphic chart freely on the interactive chart most
of the time .
4. can not adjust the spacing among indicators, RSI ,MACD , ect..FIRE the HEAD of this team and WHOEVER creates the idea of
switching the classic version to the new one . Make them
responsible for this mess.endless of complains about the new version.
2nd ranked -
keep checking back to see if you are listening to your viewers. Sad to see you are not.
I keep checking back thinking you all at Yahoo will see the light and go back to the original format, but disappointingly you are not. Looking at other sites and will continue to do so until I find one that functions well. Yours does not anymore. Slow (extremely), shifts portfolios around seemingly randomly after data is entered, and takes forever to load and move between accounts or when moving within the site. Really bad. Anyway, you had a great product and you truly ruined it with this new mess.
3rd ranked -
charts
Cannot read the numbers for bolinger bands chart is too cramped. If you cannot fix it just go back to the classic view.
Does anyone who writes the program actually trade stock? Maybe if they did they would understand how hard it is to use the chart as it is and how good the classic version was. Sad that you destroyed your entire stock trading platform.
4th ranked -
Send the web design team to remedial Website development 101 where they at least cover User acceptance testing tactics
Send the web design team to remedial Website development 101 where they at least cover User acceptance testing tactics
5th ranked -
6th ranked
-
7th ranked
-
Twenty six years of Yahoo Finance Thank you! I have purchased many subscriptions
Twenty six years of Yahoo Finance Thank you! I have purchased many subscriptions Bloomberg, Motley, Alpha etc. all starting here but in the last week I have been on other portfolio management sites looking for an alternative. Somehow I believe you know exactly what your doing but your motivation, I have no Idea. Welcome all to THE NEW COKE :(
8th ranked -
In the new format, there doesn't seem to be a way to see, for a particular stock, date of purchase, number of shares and price paid
It doesn't seem possible to find individual purchases of each stock, with dates and costs, as in the old version. Too much space is used up on the right side with general info, blocking specific information on individual stocks. The new version is terrible, done by programmers who don't use it themselves.
10th ranked -
Now no longer have Yahoo Finance as an open tab and rarely use Yahoo Finance. All the other business sites thank Yahoo.
Now no longer have Yahoo Finance as an open tab and rarely use Yahoo Finance. All the other business sites thank Yahoo.
8th ranked -
Provide option to revert to CLASSIC or scrap the new layout all together
The new layout is NOT an improvement. Looking at this feedback this should be obvious by now.
12th ranked -
They destroyed a clear image of Yahoo Finance for this new one that is very vague, confusing and poorly designed.
They destroyed a clear image of Yahoo Finance for this new one that is very vague, confusing and poorly designed.
11th ranked -
It is imperative that someone contact the management of Apollo Global (they own 90% of YAHOO). Please make more people understand that this
It is imperative that someone contact the management of Apollo Global (they own 90% of YAHOO). Please make more people understand that this is a big problem.
To be sure, VERIZON (they own 10% of YAHOO) should also be informed about everything.
Who probably does not need to be informed is the director. What is Jim Lanzone's name? Is he still sitting in the director's chair?
The CEO is responsible for this unusable waste.
13th ranked -
Bargain Bin Website
Did you purchase this site off the Nordstrom Rack?
13th ranked -
Everyone stop dealing with the technical side of this useless garbage. I described to them a large pile of errors. it doesn't make sense. It
Everyone stop dealing with the technical side of this useless garbage. I described to them a large pile of errors. it doesn't make sense. It's a jumble of mistakes stuck together. That couldn't even be fixed.
It only makes sense to throw it in the trash.
All indications are that someone at yahoo has (or will have?) a big problem. Invested money will not bring improvement.
Does Yahoo pay someone to drive away users?
What kind of logic is that?
Or is it corruption?
15th ranked -
Moved over to MSN . Very accommodating and easy to navigate. Guess they don't care if users abandon this site.
Moved to MSN money, very accommodating and easy to navigate. Guess they don't mind users abandoning this site. Not coming back unless they give option to revert, which is highly doubtful.
17th ranked -
Could you please go back to the Classic Finance format - this new format is confusing, hard to read, and contains too much information.
Could you please go back to the Classic Finance format - this new format is confusing, hard to read, and contains too much information.
16th ranked -
Maybe MSN, Marketwatch, Google or NASDAQ.com are listening.
If another site re-created Classic Yahoo finance, I'm sure several disgruntles eyeballs would go there.
18th ranked -
The new format is awful.
Oh my God this new format is awful.
Please make the classic available.19th ranked -
Make the extra market/index display on the top right of the portfolio display optional. Wastes too much screen area.
Make the extra market/index display on the top right of the portfolio display optional. Wastes too much screen area on unrequested info, and cuts off portfolio columns. It also leaves about 20% of the screen below it empty. Also, why the large left margin -- more wasted screen area. Thanks.
19th ranked
- Don't see your idea?