Be more balanced in your reporting hire some conservative reporters. Do we really need a ********** story every day.
Do we really need to see 2 homosexuals kissing everyday. How about focusing in on real issues like ObamaCare,the economy,maybe have a liberal point of view (that should not be hard for Yahoo) then have a conservative counter point of view (that will be very hard for Yahoo) It is called balanced reporting. Yahoo reporting right now is no different then listening to the lams-stream media. If you brought conservative in to the mix you would become much more popular ever wonder why Fox News has more viewership then CNN and MSNBC combined. You would thing Yahoo would do it just from a business point of view, but maybe they just can't put their business over their agenda..
Anonymous
shared this idea
-
jerry
commented
I think the stories are kinda ranked by clicks and interest. So, maybe Yahoo might be a bit "left leaning" because many or most of it's users are also left leaning, or, the right leaning folks keep clicking on certain stories just to comment and belittle Obama and Hilary, making it look like those are the stories that are popular. The popular stories make it to the top of the pile. So, when you are clicking on that Hilary story to mock her, you helped to make it higher on the list. I can absolutely see why the "negative" Trump stories are what you see more of, people are on them in droves arguing both sides. If you want more right leaning stories, click on them, and quit going to left leaning stories just to mock them in the comments section. Also, I think that trolls, maybe Russian, are helping this by going to left leaning stories just to spread falsehoods. It has been shown that there is a whole industry in Russia dedicated to such things.
-
Jim
commented
Okay, so your (Yahoo's) kook far-left liberal leanings (to put it mildly) have finally reached a cresendo that I simply am not willing to put up with. With the possible exception of my e-mail (but will be look into something to replace that, too), you are hereby banished to the Media Junkpile of Liberal Bias. Your so-called "reporting" of late has become nothing but a complete joke; a great deal of it is outright misinformation and as far as I am able to tell most of the rest of it is nothing short of a transparent, intentional misrepresentation of actual news. And now you even removing critically important non-Yahoo based news resources from your "yahoo.com" and "news.yahoo.com" webpages.
Enough already.
Yahoo has not been an unbiased, reliable news source for many years, but you have now gone over to the 'Huffington Post Philosophy of News Reporting and Content Filtering' and that simply is not acceptable to any thinking, non-kook leftist human being.
I consider myself an independent (small "i") and used to put up with Yahoo's unbelievable level of bias. No more though.
Adios, suckers... forever more.
-
PhD.MIT
commented
A NUCLEAR BOMB detonated 100 MILES in ANY direction from NYC in a boat, plane or truck would KILL most infidels in NYC by BURNING or RADIATION SICKNESS from RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT IN DAYS, WEEKS, MONTHS OR YEARS. Obama said about 3 months ago: "I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT A NUCLEAR BOMB IN NYC.". The UTTER HORROR IS that recent events have CONVERGED to make a NUKED NYC LIKELY IN 0-5 YEARS. 1st the AVAILABILITY of a nuclear bomb from IRAN, the CRAZY KID in North Korea, TALIBAN raids NOW in PAKISTAN which has 50-100 NUCLEAR BOMBS and 2nd ISIS NOW has 2 BILLION $ to BUY NUCLEAR BOMBS, many terrorists with WESTERN PASSPORTS, and many SAFE HAVENS in Iraq and Syria to prepare a NUKED NYC, as 9/11 was prepared in Aftganistan. Liberal Couric in 2008 gave us Obama, who did not destroy ISIS before ISIS got to Iraqi cities and consequently Obama/Couric gave us the above.
-
frank
commented
Im ok with the political stories.