Return comments
Support your customer and return comments. I think we should set up a time and all boycott this site if they do not return our right to comment on these articles which most are just someone's opinion or comment. Let's pick a time.
Darin L Harder
shared this idea
73 comments
-
Nicholas Gonzalez
commented
There is an obvious liberal bias in how these articles are developed. I say this as someone who’s not even a conservative or Republican. There is nothing wrong in a balanced, if not actually objective, reporting. Unless Yahoo clearly admits where their leanings are then what is put out is insincere. Furthermore, if comments cannot comment there should be more than one point of view on the topics so that we can trust your material and not be alienated but simply engaged to make an informed decision. Anything less, then every article should be labeled an Editorial, which it is.
-
nick gonzales
commented
COMMENTS. Let the people speak. What is Yahoo scared of 🤔 people getting their feelings hurt. At least FB let's us comment on their BS. Yahoo doesn't have the BALLS to let the people speak their minds. GROW UP YAHOO & PUT YOUR BIG BOY PANTS ON 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
-
nick gonzales
commented
COMMENTS. Let the people speak. What is Yahoo scared of 🤔 people getting their feelings hurt. At least FB let's us comment on their BS. Yahoo doesn't have the BALLS to let the people speak their minds. GROW UP YAHOO & PUT YOUR BIG BOY PANTS ON 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
-
Gus T
commented
Nothing as dangerous as people who believe they know & understand BUT DON'T. Ignorance, noise & opinion. More wrong, more vociferous.
Understanding the First Amendment & its application is fundamental to understanding Democracy, America & the seperation of public & private spheres. Basically Americans freedoms versus state control. PATRIOTS WILL GET IT RIGHT. Socialists, fascists, communists will get it wrong but believe they got it right. Socialists believe business serves the government. Not it's clients.
Understanding the First Amendment.
First Amendment states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.That means government shall not restrict free discourse or opinions. Protects various forms of political speech, anonymous speech, campaign finance and school speech.
The Free Press Clause protects publication of information and opinions, and applies to a wide variety of media.
Key term "congress". First Amendment applies only to state actors. DUMMIES think it prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, including private, non-governmental entities. It doesn't.
Yahoo is a privately owned entity. It owes the public nothing. To be successful in the marketplace, it must provide a product or service that has value to its clients/customers for which they will expand their limited resources. Definition of Capitalism or Free Enterprise.
It's Yahoo's platform, they aren't obligated to the user except in the terms set forth in the Customer Agreement/Contract/Policy.
Because you want to propagate nonsense & act informed about things of which you know nothing is not a reason for Comments to be available. Feel free to start your own platform, cry like a baby, continue being wrong or be a DUMMY.
Please, for those who correctly understand censorship & the Constitution, your silence would be a blessing. -
tisha russo
commented
Well it's been almost a year since you decided that you had to disable the comment section for "safe" and what ever claptrap PC off base shyte you felt you had to put up to cull the masses. Why didn't you just have the balls to tell the truth you're not ever going to bring them back. Or if you do it be under a socialist regime where the government tell you what you are told what you are going to put up.
-
FreethinkingAmerican
commented
Bring back the comments section....your fake stories are a joke.
-
Karen Hill
commented
I’ve been going to AOL since they have comments but a lot of the article links point to annoying junk websites that make you click through pages to read a full article. Please bring back comments!
-
Joseph Seiler
commented
Americans expressing their opinions is one of the most important freedoms in our country. Yahoo is a public space, so turning opinions off would go against the Constitution. So, any company that doesn't believe in the American Constitution, should not be allowed to operate in America. Also, they shouldn't be allowed to have any products in America.
-
Darin L Harder
commented
So since you disabled comments all people have been saying is they want them back. As have I. Still no response of any kind you pushed your far left veiws and opinions. It's time you let us respond. I have 20 years with you and if you don't bring back readers response I think you should just fold your now piece of **** news feed.
-
Freak Show
commented
Who owns this cluster **** called yahoo .It's not american owned . If it was we would not be censored .Who's great idea was it to remove the comment sections YOU ******* SPINELESS ******* COMMIE BASTARDS I HOPE THIS PERSON DIES FOR SHUTTING DOWN THE AMERICAN.PROOPE just like in commie. China You spineless chicken **** cowards
-
Alexis West
commented
You not allowing people to respond while posting only views that you guys personally support and limiting articles to only those you personally support violates freedom of speech. You also practice false advertisement by presenting only articles you view as "accurate" politically but those same articles provide no actual proof of its claims plus these articles are all only one sided from a liberal stand point and does not represent an unbiased point of view which is where the discrimination comes in. Discrimination laws also include political views and you violate them by only allowing liberal minded articles while also preventing anyone from commenting to correct many of the assumed and unverifiable points of view your articles contain. You then also make claims of "inaccurate" information to justify not sharing anything but liberals minded media but then have tabloid articles that everyone knows is full of **** and very much opinion based and inaccurate. So why is it ok to share real inaccurate stuff like tabloid articles but then not a conservative point of view. This violates constitutional laws and discrimination laws and is actually the definition of psychological warfare. If this keeps up people will stop using your services in place of ones that are more upstanding. I perso ally find it offensive for you to be violating my rights to read unbiased material from all points of view rather than your hand picked articles designed to manipulate and influence the minds of the readers rather than just plan and simple information and letting the readers choose for themselves.
-
Kevin Sprague
commented
You MORONS should bring back the comments section so we can correct all the mistakes you dumbasses make!!!
-
pete L delosreyes
commented
Open it up to all opinion wether they’re right or left. Since everybody knows Yahoo is “ULTRA LEFT”