Skip to content

J.K.

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J.K. supported this idea  · 
  2. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J.K. commented  · 

    Giving a point for a first down sounds good at first glance. However, I think the result would actually be negative. PPR is better. Catching a pass in-bounds is a reception. That's an important accomplishment, especially when the pass is poorly thrown or the coverage is tight.
    I agree with the statement that players who gain nine yards on first and ten do more for their teams than players who gain two yards on second and one.

    J.K. supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J.K. commented  · 

    I believe that this becomes too many yardage categories.
    If you do anything to it, make it like yardage points for passing, rushing & receiving --- something like each team starting with 6 points and having .01 point subtracted for each yard allowed, or starting with 40 points and having .1 point subtracted for each yard allowed.
    Obviously, this plan also works for points scored against the DEF -- each team starting with 10 points and having .25 point subtracted for each point scored.
    And it works well with FGs -- 3 points per FG plus .1 point for each yard of distance beyond 18 yards.
    And it would cause no problems for the "Negative" leagues (the leagues where players lose points for scoring). Their DEFs could start with zero points and receive .01 point for each yard allowed, or .1 point for each yard allowed. And they could start with zero points and receive .1 point for point scored against them, or 1 point for each point scored against them, or whatever factor the Commish decides to put into the settings.
    I expect that a computer can more efficiently crank out scores using a simple equation such as these than go through a series of if-then statements while awarding points, and the fractional points greatly reduce the probablility of a tie in a head-to-head match.

  3. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J.K. commented  · 

    A position cap would actually reduce the flexibility of managers.
    That's the wrong direction.
    Managers need more flexibility, not less.

  4. 11th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J.K. commented  · 

    Derek, I really don't want to see a video of you in a Fantasy Football league.

Feedback and Knowledge Base