RocknRef
My feedback
27 results found
-
23rd rankedRocknRef
supported this idea
·
-
21st rankedRocknRef
supported this idea
·
-
19th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment RocknRef
commented
Yeah, true for us night workers but you guys have an advantage on making roster adjustments on daily lineups that I often miss because I'm sleeping. Football is the worst for me. I have to set an alarm for 9am pacific time after a few hours sleep to make moves. Same in Baseball especially for day games. So, it swings both ways, and Yahoo already made changes to their public leagues in Basketball comcerning your complaint. As a result, Indont play those anymore because East Coast 9-5ers have too much of an advantage now
-
3rd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RocknRef
commented
This would also be unnecessary for my leagues as I dont play weekly matchups that count for 1 win. And I dont use matchups as a tie breaker for the problem you stated above. If you play head to head but use categories as wins, losses and ties, you have the ability to balance this out over the course of a season. Each player has the potential for 82 games.
An error occurred while saving the comment RocknRef
commented
There are weekly leagues that may be better suited for that idea.
Most of us now are used to the streaming players aspect of these weekly matchups. And many of us enjoy finding players based upon their # of games/wk. Plus, as someone else pointed out, with so many players taking nights off now limiting the number of games will not make it any more even. -
1st rankedRocknRef
supported this idea
·
-
27th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RocknRef
commented
Draft accordingly, players should be rewarded for their flexibility to play multiple postions.
-
8th rankedRocknRef
supported this idea
·
Other way around Dillon