Duane Ludden
My feedback
5 results found
-
25th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Duane Ludden
supported this idea
·
-
10th rankedDuane Ludden
supported this idea
·
-
59th rankedDuane Ludden
supported this idea
·
-
3rd rankedDuane Ludden
supported this idea
·
-
19th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Duane Ludden
commented
Why must this be either/or??!! Communication is at the core of these leagues. You just took one away. Maybe you should/have to do this for public leagues given the vile comments I"ve seen there. But NO reason to eliminate for private leagues. This reduces communication. And forcing me as commissioner, at request of the league, to look at other sites for our league...after 21 years on yahoo. Sux. We used the message board for voting on rule changes, tracking details of trades, recording for prospective rule changes for next year, historical context, among other things. Who the heck does Yahoo talk to in making these decisions?? Certainly not league commissioners. Very unsettling. I have not used Fantrax but some of the comments here sound good. I guess I will need to review.
I am assuming Yahoo asking $25 for this option with a result is unfair scheduling (play one owner 6x and other owners 0x) was not the intent!! A simple programming change of playing each owner a minimum of 2x and maximum of 3x would fix this. Or you gotta allow commissioner to change the entire schedule.