ROBERT SCHWALB
My feedback
8 results found
-
51st rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
-
7th rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
-
1st rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
-
29th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment ROBERT SCHWALB
commented
please do away with the two position eligible designation in football. this can cause one team too have a unfair advantage over the others. giving that owner the opportunity to play four RBS in standard leagues while all the other owners can only play three. Or playing two QB's instead of one. this causes a problem in my long term league year every year. Tayson Hil is a ensample QB/TE
/ -
6th rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
-
14th rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
-
22nd rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
-
13th rankedROBERT SCHWALB
supported this idea
·
A the commissioner of a league that’s been going for over 25 years I’ve tried to set up a league that plays multiple styles of offences. Standard, Run & Shoot, Wish Bone and Two TE’s. Thus our league is set up to start 2 WR’s, 1 RB, 1 TE, a WR/RB position, and a WR/RB/TE position. By listing a player at “TWO POSITIONS”, Say a WR/RB or QB/TE. You open the door for one owner in a league to run a two QB offence or even a four RB offence. These are not offences played in the NFL. Thus giving one team owner a advantage over the others.