Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

15 results found

  1. 29th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 8th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. 19th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 25th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 26th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Putting limits on the number of players a team can have at a position
    will not stop teams from cheating.
    The Commish should solve the cheating issue by deleting players
    and locking teams.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with the comment from James posted Oct.15.
    It really sucks when you join a league & then the commish changes rules after the draft.
    I'd hate to have this rule thrust upon me after a draft.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Aubry is right. We have no need for this rule.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think more is involved than just the fantasy points that they score.
    RBs are more likely to get hurt.
    I want some insurance against those injuries.
    And, the only way to have it is to draft one or two extra RB back-ups.
    It's the only intelligent way to draft.
    If you prohibit this insurance, you will hurt the better managers and reward the not-so-good managers.
    Do you really want to do that?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Having a "roster limit for position" would be a negative development. I strongly oppose it.

  7. 28th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 20th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 12th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 18th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 7th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The idea of adding Punters is good.
    I'm not voting for this item because I don't really see how adding Coaches would help the game.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    A player who gains nine yards on 1st-&-ten has done much more for his team than a player who gains two yards on 2nd-&-one.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Accepting this idea would also solve the problem that FGs of 60+ yards should count more than 50-59 yard FGs.

  13. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with JK. Results would be better (more fair, more accurate) if every team played every team each week.
    Also, the yahoo computers would no longer have to create and store a league schedule, saving CPU time & storage space. .

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The "Power Points" plan that Wayne suggested appears to be a cleaner, more efficient method than Cross-Country ranking.
    The problem, I fear, is that too many players are totally bought into the concept of Won-Loss rankings.
    So, I expect that changing to Cross-Country ranking should be done first, then move on to Power Points a couple of years later.

  14. 13th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree that Adam's predictions have proven to be false. I saw almost no messages posted by players this year.
    Maybe they were there and I just didn't see them. If so, then the lay-out needs to be changed to make it easier to find them.
    However, I really believe that the re-design pushed the comment section so far down the screen that players simply didn't notice that they are capable of posting comments.

  15. 6th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base