Skip to content

John Haakenson

My feedback

9 results found

  1. 22nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Haakenson supported this idea  · 
  2. 37th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Haakenson supported this idea  · 
  3. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    Additional penalty for player who loses a fumble and its returned for a TD. Right now Yahoo penalizes a QB who throws a pick-six -2 for the pick and an additional -2 for the TD given up. The same concept should be applied to any player (Q,R,W,T) who loses a fumble and its returned. For example -2 for the lost fumble, and additional -2 (or maybe more) penalty if its returned for a TD.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    Like the idea, adds yet another dimension to follow. If it is a "horrible idea" don't add the position to your league scoring.

  4. 21st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Haakenson supported this idea  · 
  5. 6th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Haakenson supported this idea  · 
  6. 7th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    Not immediately, some times when selecting a draft slot (say #4) another gets if first and you get #6 which you don't want. So you need time to be sure you don't want to move to another draft.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    I agree, especially close to the actual draft time, it is a good idea to filter out those in Standard formats vs. PPR. There can be a materially different strategy and the preseason-to-date ADP's are different.

    John Haakenson supported this idea  · 
  7. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    Why not just eliminate H2H and go with "most points" scored season to date? That is essentially what you want. Teams that put in the best line-up and scores the most finish higher. Points scored is the way and that exists. Not as much fun as the H2H and all the smack talking that can result.

  8. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    No, I think not. Might as well just draft "team" QB, team RB, team WR, team TE etc. Best/worst part of Fantasy football is getting ****** that you started the wrong guy....again!

  9. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Haakenson commented  · 

    I agree, we had 10 teams and used the 2-week top 4 and second 4 championship and consolation play-off. But the bottom two wanted to play for 2more weeks so we did an off the system head to head 2 weeks for them. It would be nice to be able to customize something like that. Others have different ideas. good one!!

Feedback and Knowledge Base