Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  348 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Rosters/Lineups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I oppose this idea.
    I want to keep some good players on my bench at all times.
    They are useful for injuries and byeweeks.
    Limiting my bench will limit my ability to manage my team well.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't want to join a league & then discover that the Commish is enforcing a roster limit on some position.
    And I don't want to be in a league with a Commish who can impose a roster limit on some position at some point in the season.
    Well, I guess maybe I'd be okay with it IF the players are allowed to remove the Commish after he imposes a roster limit and then we could return the league to sensible rules.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I oppose this idea.
    I want to keep a couple of good players on my bench at all times.
    They are useful for injuries and byeweeks.
    Limiting my bench will limit my ability to manage my team well.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    If this idea is accepted, how easy (how difficult) will it be to check the rules for each league to see whether a max has been put on to a position?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    MaveROCK -- Perhaps you should add the chance-of-injury to your analysis. Although QBs do get injured, RBs are much more likely to be injured. So, having one reserve QB should be plenty enough most seasons to handle injury problems and bye week problems.
    You are obviously correct that more starting WRs are in the NFL than starting RBs. However, with 3rd-down backs and change-of-pace backs, a surprisingly large number of RBs are available who score more fantasy points than most WRs.
    In fact, several teams have a fullback who scores more fantasy points than some starting WRs.
    I again suggest that the problem can be solved more simply by changing your league's settings. Add a second QB to each team's starting lineup, or add another receiver position (WR/TE) to each team's starting lineup. You may be surprised at how easily you shift the behavior of your managers.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    MaveROCK -- Do you ever follow "hand-cuff" recommendations? Many Fantasy Football magazines suggest that you draft your star RB's back-up player. An obvious example would be drafting RB Peterson of the Vikings, then drafting RB Gerhart of the Vikings as an insurance policy for when Peterson is unable to play -- which happened during four of Peterson's seven seasons in the NFL.
    The hand-cuff strategy is well worn. It has proven to be a really really really good idea with RBs. I don't understand why you would want to eliminate this strategy in your league.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't want to join a league & then discover that the Commish is enforcing a roster limit on some position.
    And I don't want to be in a league with a Commish who can impose a roster limit on some position at some point in the season.
    Well, I guess maybe I'd be okay with it IF the players are allowed to remove the Commish after he imposes a roster limit.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It sounds as though you set up your league with some positions scoring a lot more points than other positions.
    If you had set it up so that each position is valuable, then owners would have a reason to draft a good balance of players/positions.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't see how a cap on the number of RBs or QBs or whatever that a team can draft would help in any of my leagues.

  2. 26th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 20th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  28 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Fantasy Profile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with JamesK. Let's have every team play every team every week.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    What happens in an eight team league when a week's scores are:
    90, 85, 80, 75, 70, 35, 25, and 20 ?
    The average score for the league was 60 that week.
    Five teams scored above the average, and three teams scored below it.
    Will the five teams each receive a win while the three teams receive a loss?
    It will look stupid for the league to have more wins than losses.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Two games per week reduces the problem, but doesn't solve it.
    The "all-play" option is better.
    Have every team play every other team every week.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with Jim. Some other ideas have been posted
    which would solve this problem more elegantly.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The idea of each team playing each team every week
    is so much more compelling -- and for all the reasons listed by those supporting this idea.
    It does a better job of reducing the luck-of-the schedule.
    It would greatly increase the probability of the best teams being identified during the season.
    It would be easier for Fantasy Football players to understand.
    Plus, it would be easier to get the computer code written correctly.

  5. 18th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  37 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Drafts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 7th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  151 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Drafts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. 10th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  66 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Rosters/Lineups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree -- Yahoo should not allow the commish to change roster positions after the draft.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Changing a league's "settings" (or rules) after the draft is cheating.
    It should NOT be allowed.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Changing a league's "settings" (or rules) after the draft is a form of cheating.
    It should not be allowed.

  8. 2nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  415 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Playoffs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    No Problem -- Just have your league's Commish change the league's settings to include a consolation bracket.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Having a bye during the first week of the playoffs is a reward for the top seeded team.
    Being scheduled to play against the 8th seeded team is a reward for the top seeded team.

  9. 6th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  129 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Playoffs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  263 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Sure -- Jose should receive a medal for "not commenting on this dumb idea."
    And, Anonymous should lose at least a dozen medals for suggesting this "dumb idea."

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Should Jim should receive a medal for changing the wording on his comment?
    We get medals for just about everything else.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Maybe Yahoo could just give a medal to players each time they make a first down. I'd rather see the medals go there than to continue cluttering up my Yahoo account.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The Nov.30 comment from Anonymous seems sensible for the default.
    Then, the commish of any private league should be able to modify it as he (or the league) desires.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The idea of adding Punters to the game is a good one -- easy to implement and important to NFL football.
    Coaches are important, but I worry that you'll pay **** for choosing any scoring system that uses coaches.
    In real life, the home team wins about 60% of games. However, custom leagues have greatly varied scoring rules. I'm doubting that five points will matter in most of them.

  11. 12th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  89 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Rosters/Lineups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 13th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  67 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Chat/Message Board  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Art doesn't have to "work." It just has to occupy a location.
    Computer programs are supposed to "work."
    Yahoo Fantasy Football still doesn't "work" so well as it did a couple of years ago.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yeah, maybe Yahoo will give us a medal if we return all of our medals.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think "just did In" must mean that you made it sluggish and difficult to use, with new features that are hard to find and with the most useful old features eliminated.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree. Those who are happy with the new format are "contempt."

Feedback and Knowledge Base