Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 121st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  7 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is an excellent idea.
    Yes, Yahoo needs to allow this format.
    Actually, Yahoo should make this the preferred format.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 109th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  4 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I oppose this idea.
    I want to keep some good players on my bench at all times.
    They are useful for injuries and byeweeks.
    Limiting my bench will limit my ability to manage my team well.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't want to join a league & then discover that the Commish is enforcing a roster limit on some position.
    And I don't want to be in a league with a Commish who can impose a roster limit on some position at some point in the season.
    Well, I guess maybe I'd be okay with it IF the players are allowed to remove the Commish after he imposes a roster limit and then we could return the league to sensible rules.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    If this idea is accepted, how easy (how difficult) will it be to check the rules for each league to see whether a max has been put on to a position?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    MaveROCK -- Perhaps you should add the chance-of-injury to your analysis. Although QBs do get injured, RBs are much more likely to be injured. So, having one reserve QB should be plenty enough most seasons to handle injury problems and bye week problems.
    You are obviously correct that more starting WRs are in the NFL than starting RBs. However, with 3rd-down backs and change-of-pace backs, a surprisingly large number of RBs are available who score more fantasy points than most WRs.
    In fact, several teams have a fullback who scores more fantasy points than some starting WRs.
    I again suggest that the problem can be solved more simply by changing your league's settings. Add a second QB to each team's starting lineup, or add another receiver position (WR/TE) to each team's starting lineup. You may be surprised at how easily you shift the behavior of your managers.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    MaveROCK -- Do you ever follow "hand-cuff" recommendations? Many Fantasy Football magazines suggest that you draft your star RB's back-up player. An obvious example would be drafting RB Peterson of the Vikings, then drafting RB Gerhart of the Vikings as an insurance policy for when Peterson is unable to play -- which happened during four of Peterson's seven seasons in the NFL.
    The hand-cuff strategy is well worn. It has proven to be a really really really good idea with RBs. I don't understand why you would want to eliminate this strategy in your league.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't want to join a league & then discover that the Commish is enforcing a roster limit on some position.
    And I don't want to be in a league with a Commish who can impose a roster limit on some position at some point in the season.
    Well, I guess maybe I'd be okay with it IF the players are allowed to remove the Commish after he imposes a roster limit.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It sounds as though you set up your league with some positions scoring a lot more points than other positions.
    If you had set it up so that each position is valuable, then owners would have a reason to draft a good balance of players/positions.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I don't see how a cap on the number of RBs or QBs or whatever that a team can draft would help in any of my leagues.

  4. 165th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  4 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 128th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  6 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 88th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  2 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 51st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  11 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Position Eligibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 28th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  19 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 46th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  12 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 48th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  5 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 132nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  4 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Playoffs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 126th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 706th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    So, when a team wins 9-7, you want to give a bonus point to the QB whose team scored just 3 FGs.
    Then, when a team loses 42-45, you want to not give a bonus point to the QB who threw six TDs.
    That's stupid. The rules should reward good performance.

  14. 209th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 32nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  15 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  33 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Draft Issues  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 10th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  261 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with JamesK. Let's have every team play every team every week.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Two games per week reduces the problem, but doesn't solve it.
    The "all-play" option is better.
    Have every team play every other team every week.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with Jim. Some other ideas have been posted
    which would solve this problem more elegantly.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The idea of each team playing each team every week
    is so much more compelling -- and for all the reasons listed by those supporting this idea.
    It does a better job of reducing the luck-of-the schedule.
    It would greatly increase the probability of the best teams being identified during the season.
    It would be easier for Fantasy Football players to understand.
    Plus, it would be easier to get the computer code written correctly.

  18. 132nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I oppose this idea.
    I want to keep a couple of good players on my bench at all times.
    They are useful for injuries and byeweeks.
    Limiting my bench will limit my ability to manage my team well.

  19. 26th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 24th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  30 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Draft Issues  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base