Skip to content

Me Knows

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    Regardless of whether a kick-off is onside or squib or regular,
    the kicking team should be awarded points each time / every time
    the kicking team gets possession of the ball.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    1. Scoring a point (or half point) for each touchback seems reasonable and easy to add to the game.
    2. This idea would be an extra complication without being good football. The previous scores were necessary before a last-minute kick could be a "game winner." And, why should only kickers be rewarded for a "game winner" score?
    3. Leagues with IDP's already have this idea in their scoring.
    4. This idea has potential. Any time on onside kick is successful, credit the Kicker for a fumble recovery. We should also probably credit the player who captured the ball with a fumble recovery.

    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    I don't see how giving credit for making a first down would increase the value of goal line backs.
    I easily understand that goal line backs (short yardage specialists) are the guys often used for third & one and fourth & one situations. However, most first downs are made by other players. Giving credit for first downs would actually decrease the Relative-Value of goal line backs.
    The players who would benefit most from the change would be QBs and possession receivers.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    This idea should be easy enough to implement. The stats needed are readily available. All Yahoo needs to do is to come up with good categories for scoring.
    Actually, I believe that good-equations-for-scoring would be the better way to go.
    And, I believe that this position should be added only in private leagues. The newbies in public leagues probably need to learn the basics of the game before being confronted by this position.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    Ponder the following.
    It’s first and ten and a receiver runs a 9-yard out route, makes the catch and is immediately tackled. The player did something well. It's now second and one. The team now has two chances (maybe three chances) to gain one more yard. It can afford to take a shot at a deep pass play. It can try almost anything on second and one.
    If a player then succeeds on a short gain (like one or two yards), the player really doesn't deserve a specil bonus for making a first down. Rather, the player who gained nine yards on first down -- and set-up the excellent situation of a second and one deserves the primary credit.

  2. 25th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    I'd prefer to see Yahoo use "All In Play" for league standings.
    Have each team play every other team every week.
    It would solve the problem that you want to solve.
    And,it would be more fair.

  3. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    Please discard this idea.

    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    If Yahoo implements this rule
    and a commish changes to the rule after the draft,
    will I be allowed to drop the league?
    If not, then please don't allow this rule.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    This idea is not necessary.
    Well, it's worse than that.
    It would be destructive to good fantasy play.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    This idea is not necessary.
    Well, it's worse than that.
    It would be destructive to good fantasy play.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    I think Victor should receive a "Dumb Idea" medal for posting this suggestion.
    If Yahoo would award medals for these suggestions, then it would encourage medal-loving managers to post more dumb ideas & we could all benefit from the entertainment provided.

  4. 23rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    I'd prefer to see Yahoo use "All In Play" for league standings.
    Have each team play every team in the league every week.
    It would be a better solution for the problem that you want to solve.
    It would be more fair.
    It would eliminate the need for the computer to create a schedule of which team plays which team each week.

    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
  5. 24th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
  6. 11th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
  7. 9th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
  8. 17th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Me Knows supported this idea  · 
  9. 6th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Me Knows commented  · 

    Please discard this idea.

  10. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

Feedback and Knowledge Base