James
My feedback
13 results found
-
4th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment James
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
If I join a league and then the Commish imposes this limit rule,
will I be allowed to drop the league?
In the past, when the Commish changes rules,
Yahoo has not allowed us to drop out of the league.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
If I join a league and then the Commish imposes this limit rule,
will I be allowed to drop the league?
In the past, when the Commish changes rules,
Yahoo has not allowed us to drop out of the league.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
If I join a league and then the Commish imposes this limit rule,
will I be allowed to drop the league?
In the past, when the Commish changes rules,
Yahoo has not allowed us to drop out of the league.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
If I join a league and then the Commish imposes this limit rule,
will I be allowed to drop the league?
In the past, when the Commish changes rules,
Yahoo has not allowed us to drop out of the league.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
This idea would be detrimental to Fantasy Football.
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
This idea would be detrimental to Fantasy Football.
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Checking the rules doesn't always help. The commish can change them.
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
If I join a league and then the Commish imposes this limit rule,
will I be allowed to drop the league?
In the past, when the Commish changes rules,
Yahoo has not allowed us to drop out of the league.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I agree with Klondike (on Dec.24). The Hand Cuff concept of drafting is to get the back-up players for your RBs. Fantasy Football players have been using it forever, and they have been rewarded for it because RBs are frequently injured.
The only fair way to put a cap on the number of RBs that a team drafts is to enforce a rule against the NFL that prohibits RBs from being injured. I want to see how far that rule goes.
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Some players have a history of injury problems. For example, RB McFadden.
If I have him on my team, I automatically assume that I need an extra RB on my bench from what I would need if I had RB Jamaal Charles.
Limiting the number of RBs that I can have on my bench means that I need to avoid drafting a really good player such as McFadden.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I agree with what JK wrote below (dated Oct.11).
-
25th rankedJames
supported this idea
·
-
19th rankedJames
supported this idea
·
-
1st rankedJames
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I've read many ideas in these suggestion pages which would make a league "distinctive." Good ideas include giving a bonus to special teams (DEFs) which recover an on-side kick, adding punters, giving extra credit to 60+ yard FGs, changing a few of the scoring categories to equations, having every team play every team each week instead of just one team per week, and giving a bonus to DEFs which hold an opponent to less than 50 yards (or 100 yards) offense.
Every one of those ideas sounds more useful to me than giving a bonus point for making a first down. I'd rather see yards gained become worth more than giving a bonus for making a first down.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Klondike should receive a medal for posting a comment which contains ****, and I should also.
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Actually, J.K. is probably right about making it an equation, as we do with yardage gained by QBs, RBs, WRs, & TEs.
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Why start with <100 yards?
Why not start with <50 yards?
It rarely happens, but it should be valuable when it does happen.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
The stats on punters are easily available already. So, they should be easy enough to add.
I'd expect some value for length of punt plus some value for punts inside the 20 and some subtraction for blocked punts. -
28th rankedJames
supported this idea
·
-
2nd rankedJames
supported this idea
·
-
5th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I agree with the problem, but better solutions are available.
Your league can use "total points" ranking to determine the team which really was the best during the season.
Or, Yahoo can adopt cross-country scoring.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I agree with the problem, but better solutions are available.
Your league can use "total points" ranking to determine the team which really was the best during the season.
Or, Yahoo can adopt cross-country scoring.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I agree with the problem, but better solutions are available.
Your league can use "total points" ranking to determine the team which really was the best during the season.
Or, Yahoo can adopt cross-country scoring.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
I think Steven Bernier explained the problem with this rule precisely.
At the end of the season, a league could have several undefeated teams.
What a mess that would be!An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
The primary benefit of this change hasn't been mentioned.
Under this system, we would no longer have any problem with leagues containing an odd number of teams.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
The primary benefit of this change hasn't been mentioned.
Under this system, we would no longer have any problem with leagues containing an odd number of teams.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
The primary benefit of this change hasn't been mentioned.
Under this system, we would no longer have any problem with leagues containing an odd number of teams.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
The primary benefit of this change hasn't been mentioned.
Under this system, we would no longer have any problem with leagues containing an odd number of teams.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
i agree with every team playing every team each week, not the idea of creating a league-average opponent each week.
-
20th rankedJames
supported this idea
·
-
7th ranked
-
6th ranked
-
13th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Yep -- Leave it to an Arts guy/gal to know the truth,
"Those that are happy and actually like the new format won't be providing any feedback because they are, in fact, contempt."
.
I believe that one. They are "in fact, contempt."
.Please, Yahoo, don't be "contempt."
Please return to us the features that we miss from the old Fantasy Football.An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
Does "just did In" mean that you killed it?
If only that were true ... -
12th rankedJames
supported this idea
·
-
10th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment James
commented
The league commish can make changes to the league's "settings" -- but changing the rules after the draft should NOT happen.
If they are hoarding QBs, then they are lacking subs at other positions.
So, are you using 2QBs, but just 1 K & DEF ?
That problem is easy to solve -- use 2 Ks & 2 DEFs.