james harrison
My feedback
5 results found
-
7th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment james harrison
commented
Explain why this post was rejected....
Wrong Scott, he was treated as an ordinary citizen and was mauled by the press.He pleaded guilty, paid his back taxes plus the fines levied. In the firearms case, as he has no prior convictions, he was fined and penalized like any other citizen. And as a private citizen he's been treated as such. The only ones making a stink over his plight are the crazies in the GOP and the right wing nuts that still think Hillary is running a prostitution ring.... Get a life you people.james harrison
supported this idea
·
-
42nd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment james harrison
commented
Please explain why this was rejected...:
Personally I have no issues with V.P. Harris. She's not a dummy contrary to what some of her critics say. She was a good prosecutor a good senator and she has a good moral compass and a good marriage. All pluses in my book. Plus she's loyal to the president and the goals of the party.An error occurred while saving the comment james harrison
commented
I got bounced for providing the definition of "woke"... I asked for an explanation and heard crickets....
I looked it up... According to Wikipedia, :"Woke: is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination". Beginning in the 2010s, it came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities, such as sexism, racism."james harrison
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment james harrison
commented
You would not allow this posting and I would like to what community guideline I overstepped...
"I looked it up... According to Wikipedia, :"Woke: is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination". Beginning in the 2010s, it came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities, such as sexism, racism." -
34th rankedjames harrison
supported this idea
·
-
28th rankedjames harrison
supported this idea
·
-
17th rankedjames harrison
supported this idea
·
Why was this rejected??? There's no foul language. No slam against the person it's directed to. And unless you are now limiting free speech, what is the issue with this post?