Skip to content

Tom Kirk

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 25th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    Lame idea! Only the unprepared need this change made. This need you have can and should be filled by the owners Bench players. Bad roster management is the real culprit. I bet all these guys that want this are generally hoarding 8 and 9 RBs on his bench. Balance your bench positions people.

  2. 14th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    I disagree. This is what is wrong with fantasy football. Too many players don't understand **** about how the game is supposed to be played. All scoring categories should have one value assigned to it. A PPR should be valued the same across the board. This isn't golf. Don't handicap less favorable positions based on your personal preference. A TD is a TD! A PPR is a PPR! A sack is a sack! People, stop being ridiculous. It's about the "value" of an on field achievement for the team.

  3. 37th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    I'm against this. Do not allow this. It makes collusion way too easy. Too many cheaters or personalities that impose their will on the weaker minded. No, no, no... terrible idea.

  4. 12th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    I believe in Deep Rosters, not Deep Benches.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    I run an IDP, Dynasty league and I don't really think you need more roster slots. We have 22-man starting roster w/ 8 bench. I think its sufficient. My format includes 9 starting IDP positions. Too large of a roster depletes your Free Agent market too much.
    I saw some guy request 50 slots, LOL... that's way, way to many. Maybe, maybe 40 but I still think that is too much. But with all that said, I would like the option to go up to 32 roster positions so I can increase my bench from 8 to 10 positions. So in a round-about way I do agree with an increase but 40 max for sure!

  5. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    BIG MUST HAVE!!! Too many people (the uneducated or nefarious ones) horde RBs during the season. Please ad feature. But allow Commissioners to set the limit.
    Thank you

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Kirk commented  · 

    Must Have. Please give Commissioners this "Option". Position Limits is vital to help maintain draft integrity. Too many people quit a draft or play games and horde RBs. This must me a limit feature for draft day and throughout the entire season. --- Please add "Position Limits" feature that Commissioners can utilize at their own discretion.

    Tom Kirk supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base