You apparently rejected comment that I made about Trump knowing something about *, because he was adjudicated a *** during his defamation trial brought by E Jean Carroll, about an article where you state that he accuses immigrant of being RAPISTS, but I'm not allowed to comment on that very topic. Trump's judge clearly stated that he was a ***. That makes no sense and taking away my right of free speech to point out a fact flies in the face of logic. This is not the first time that you have prevented me from stating a factual point, but you let others make quite offensive statements because they don't use a word such as * or Nazi. Banning those words in articles about those very things and then not letting your readers use those words is the most idiotic policy that I can think of. It's enough to make me consider changing Yahoo from my home page and email address. The only reason that I haven't already done it is the hassle that it would cause me in having to notify all of my contacts and memberships of the change. What I may do is to simply stop reading your articles, if I can't comment on the very topics that you are writing about because those very words are taboo for your readers to even write in response to those same words that you are using in your articles. You need to reconsider automatically banning words, just because they are offensive. You need to consider context in which they are used.