How about providing an appeals process when a comment has been rejected so the person knows exactly why it was rejected
How about providing an appeals process when a comment has been rejected so the person knows exactly why it was rejected
bob povirk
shared this idea
-
Doug Enyart
commented
Yahoo rejected the following post. I did not call anyone a name or in any way criticize any person. "On this issue, perhaps the only one, I have to agree with her [Lake, AZ]. Still counting nearly a week later? Stupid."
-
Vernon Thomas
commented
Yahoo is silencing the public while twitter is letting anyone say what they want; so in other words people who are not on twitter has no voice right now because we can't make comments.
-
bob povirk
commented
A post that was an exact restatement of facts was rejected. Google and you will see this. "96% of all biologists, 85% of whom self identify as pro-choice agree that at the moment of conception or fertilization of the egg a new, separate and distinct life is created."
Why is this rejected? It is just a fact? Here is it straight from Google,
96 percent of the 5,577 biologists from 1,058 academic institutions affirmed that a human's life begins at fertilization. 85 percent of the 5,577 biologists self-identified as pro-choice, 89 percent self-identified as liberal, and 95 percent held a Ph.