shawn
My feedback
4 results found
-
38th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
The story was about people around animals at U.S. National parks. My comment was. "There's a reason they tell you to stay away from wild animals..."... and you censored it. Censor this... ********.
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
***!?!? you censored my post because of the word *** in an article about sharks!?!?! Censor this... Yuck Fou!
shawn
supported this idea
·
-
30th ranked
Hi,
Our Engineering team is looking into this. If you could let us know what about the “show less” option isn’t working we would appreciate it. Please provide specific publishers if possible.
Regards,
Homepage SupportAn error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
Dec. 28, 2019... 6 months later. I clicked show less of: The National Interest and still got 20 stories today... Business Insider and still got 17 stories today... National Review and still got 10 stories today. There you go... again. I've told you this before but you keep asking. Not going to tell you again. If they can't fix it... fire them.
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
Why should we tell you... again? Just read the F'n posts Einstein. It doesn't matter... Get it?
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
June 21, 2019... and you still can't fix it can you? Doesn't surprise me though... you censor people for using words that are used in the stories you link... you allow blatant copy and paste... and spamming. Whoever these engineers are... they fit the new Yahoo.
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
Seems by the comments... it doesn't matter who you flag... your problem is it doesn't work.
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
I click on the button to show less of "The National Interest"... and I still get 25 stories on the page. So, if I didn't click that button I would get how many stories from them... one thousand?
shawn
supported this idea
·
-
13th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
You won't let people use words that are in the articles... but you'll let people have a gazillion accounts... or copy and paste the whole article in the comment section. You people are *********.
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
Why was this censored!?!? "@andrew... He's been re-elected 8 times!!! There are no "good people" in his district!"... Tell me!!! Censor this... ********!
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
The post by another said baseball players aren't athletes because they never land a punch during brawls. My reply was... "So boxers can hit 100 mph fastballs?" And I was censored. Censor this: "********".
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
The story was about a bison charging a girl and tossing her into the air. My comment was... "there's a reason they tell you to stay away from "wild Animals"... and you censored it!... Censor this... Duck Fou!
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
"Poof"!?!? you censored my post because I used the word "poof"? Censor this... ********.
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
You won't let me comment with "Boo Boo Face"?
shawn
supported this idea
·
-
17th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment shawn
commented
"Whaa"... "Whaaa"... Whaaaaa!"... I want you to censor all the stories "I" don't like!" said little karen.
Tell me what's wrong with this post... "Ut oh, someone's got a filthy mouth". ...? But you'll print the "F" word from people's twitter feed in an article. ********... censor that.