Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

11 results found

  1. 23rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 19th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 15th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    If Yahoo decides to allow a commish to establish a max player position,
    then Yahoo needs to allow it only before the draft,
    and not allow it to be put in place after the draft.

    It would be easier to simply discard this idea.
    Many unforeseen difficulties can arise from its use.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    You don't have to suggest that a commish might change the rules after the draft, and it doesn't matter how idiotic you think it would be. I've seen it happen, and Yahoo doesn't prevent it from happening in the future.
    .
    You also obviously don't understand the fun of joining a league with really different rules/players and trying out your skills in that circumstance.
    .
    The simple truth is that the proposed change will permit a commish to decide to impose roster limits after the draft. Yahoo should NOT give a commish this opportunity.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I am AGAINST this suggestion.
    I don't want to have to check the settings of each league that I might join to make sure that its commissioner didn't put maximums into the league.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I am AGAINST this proposal.
    I don't want to have to check the settings of each league that I might join to make sure that its commissioner didn't put position maximums into it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Well, Jose, I think that you are mostly right.
    However, reading the blather that Mavrock is spewing,
    I expect his league's problem would be more easily solved
    by simply adding a second QB to the starting roster.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Dopey idea.

  6. 7th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I hate it when a commish changes roster positions after the draft.

  7. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hey Anonymous -- Your equation doesn't start with zero.
    Perhaps you meant to say starting with the zero yard line?
    I would call it the goal line.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes, an equation would be better. That's not to say that more scoring categories isn't an improvement. But, an equation would be a superior improvement.
    Note to Anonymous: Why are you calling yourself what I call myself?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Continuing with the logic of valuing plays which make a first down above other plays, we obviously should change our scoring for tackles. We should give a bonus to a defensive player who tackles an opponent before he makes a first down instead of after he makes it. And we should give a bonus to DEF teams which hold the offense to a FG rather than a TD. Yup, this kind of thinking is crazy, but no more crazy than giving a bonus for making a first down.
    .
    Regarding the player who catches a screen pass and is then tackled for a loss, he probably deserves the bonus for catching a pass. The defense maybe should be rewarded with a bonus for tackling him for a loss. Often, defenses are good at stopping offensive plays. And often, just being able to catch a pass against a good defense is quite an accomplishment. Perhaps a penalty should be assessed against the QB for throwing the pass in that situation -- or maybe it is already assessed in that the lost yardage will be reflected in the QB's passing yards for the game. Further, the lost yardage will be reflected in the receiver's yards for the game. But, the receiver must catch the ball before he can start running with it, and the fact that he managed to catch the ball should be rewarded.

  8. 18th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Should we also have team RBs and team WRs and team TEs?
    .
    Team QBs will be a mess if / when the Wildcat QB becomes popular again.

  9. 11th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    You guys need to quit hating on Adam.
    He probably didn't really like the changes any more than you did.
    He probably wrote that BS to get the Yahoo guys to like him
    and to actually read and consider his opinion
    that the black background is the worst problem
    with the 2013 re-do of what was once a really good gaming system.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    ??? a fence turtle ???

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I want to expand on the message I posted here in Sept.
    I mentioned "black-on-white" when describing the old format.
    But much more is involved than just the color scheme.
    Team logos have been rounded.
    The message board is now inconvenient to use.
    The commissioner's note is stuck way down scroll.
    The emphasis seems to have been changed from inter-action with other players to x-ing out notices about stupid medals.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    No, actually, the new format sucks.
    Please allow me to use the old black-on-white format.

  10. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    A fun idea. And, with the turmoil and frustrations created by this year's re-design of Fantasy Football, Yahoo needs to have some fun ideas.

  11. 10th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base