Anonymous
My feedback
-
119th rankedGathering feedback · 7 comments · Fantasy Football » Scoring · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
86th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
46th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
107th rankedGathering feedback · 12 comments · Fantasy Football » Scoring · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
44th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
124th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
158th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
207th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
38th rankedGathering feedback · 27 comments · Fantasy Football » Draft Issues · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
31st rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30th rankedGathering feedback · 16 comments · Fantasy Football » Draft Issues · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
26th rankedGathering feedback · 7 comments · Fantasy Football » Cheating or Sportmanship · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
11th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
5th rankedGathering feedback · 33 comments · Fantasy Football » Draft Issues · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
4th rankedGathering feedback · 273 comments · Fantasy Football » Position Eligibility · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
You don't have to suggest that a commish might change the rules after the draft, and it doesn't matter how idiotic you think it would be. I've seen it happen, and Yahoo doesn't prevent it from happening in the future.
.
You also obviously don't understand the fun of joining a league with really different rules/players and trying out your skills in that circumstance.
.
The simple truth is that the proposed change will permit a commish to decide to impose roster limits after the draft. Yahoo should NOT give a commish this opportunity.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I am AGAINST this suggestion.
I don't want to have to check the settings of each league that I might join to make sure that its commissioner didn't put maximums into the league.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I am AGAINST this proposal.
I don't want to have to check the settings of each league that I might join to make sure that its commissioner didn't put position maximums into it.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Well, Jose, I think that you are mostly right.
However, reading the blather that Mavrock is spewing,
I expect his league's problem would be more easily solved
by simply adding a second QB to the starting roster.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Dopey idea.
-
6th rankedGathering feedback · 22 comments · Fantasy Sports iOS Apps » Commish Tools · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
15th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I hate it when a commish changes roster positions after the draft.
-
1st rankedGathering feedback · 365 comments · Fantasy Football » Playoffs · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Hey guys -- check this one out.
A league has six teams with scores of 180, 140, 122.22, 122.22, 121, 104.
With the third and fourth teams tied, who gets how many victory points?An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
So, let's say your league has six teams whose scores for a week are: 170, 150, 100, 90, 80, and 70. That produces a league average of 110.
So, you'd have the top two teams receive an extra win and the other four teams receive an extra loss.
I don't like that idea. I want the same number of wins as losses in the league standings. Two additional losses would look stupid. -
10th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
You could do better. You could give the top 4 teams a win, the 2 middle teams a tie, and the bottom 4 teams a loss.
You could do better. You could have each team play each team each week. That eliminates much more of the luck factor.
You could do better. You could use Total Points scoring for the season and not even mess with wins and losses. The truly best team in the league is the one which scores the most total points during the season.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Let's say that a league with six teams produces these scores during a week: 84, 83, 82, 81, 52, and 51.
Would you seriously award an extra victory point to the team with 82 points, but not award a point to the team with 81 points?
Would you seriously treat the team with 81 points the same as the team with 52 points?An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Let's say that a league with six teams produces these scores during a week: 84, 83, 82, 81, 52, and 51.
Would you seriously award an extra victory point to the team with 82 points, but not award a point to the team with 81 points?
Would you seriously treat the team with 81 points the same as the team with 52 points?An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
What if in some week the ten teams in your league score: 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 44, 43, 42, and 41 points.
Would you really give a victory point to the team which scored 82 points, but not give one to the team which scored 81 points?
Why would you treat the team which scored 81 points the same as the team which scored 44 points?An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
So, let's say that in some week the ten teams in your league score: 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 44, 43, 42, and 41 points.
Would you really give a victory point to the team which scored 82 points, but not give one to the team which scored 81 points?
Why would you treat the team which scored 81 points the same as the team which scored 44 points?An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I agree that Cross-Country scoring needs to be implemented.
Note to Stephen Staple: Giving the top half of the teams a win and the bottom half of the teams a loss each week is a step in the right direction. However, it's only a step. A better system would be to give the top third of the teams a win, the middle third a tie, and the bottom third a loss. An even better system would be to have each team play each team each week.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Why don't we go to having every team play every team every week?
It would be so much more fair.
It would be easier to understand (and explain).
And, it would be easier code for the programmers to write.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I agree with JJ that head-to-head play often results in lesser teams making the play-offs because of the "luck of the schedule."
And I agree with Jim that having every team play every team every week is a better solution than what JJ suggested.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I agree with the comments below that "Mike" posted on July 19 and that "Me" posted on Oct.24.
If Yahoo decides to allow a commish to establish a max player position,
then Yahoo needs to allow it only before the draft,
and not allow it to be put in place after the draft.
It would be easier to simply discard this idea.
Many unforeseen difficulties can arise from its use.