James Owens
My feedback
13 results found
-
4th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment James Owens
commented
This is an absolute must and a no brainer for points leagues. Yahoo must add this to fantasy baseball.
James Owens
supported this idea
·
-
34th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment James Owens
commented
This is a big issue with teams not playing multiple batters and stashing good pitchers in points league. Having a minimum and maximum amount per position would help leagues be more balanced.
James Owens
supported this idea
·
-
23rd rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
22nd rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
39th rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
13th rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
9th rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
10th rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
5th rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
3rd rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
31st rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
38th rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
-
33rd rankedJames Owens
supported this idea
·
Proposal to Implement an IP Limit for Head-to-Head Points Leagues in Yahoo Fantasy Baseball
Overview
In Yahoo Fantasy Baseball, head-to-head points leagues lack the option to set an innings pitched (IP) limit. This can lead to a significant imbalance where teams with starting pitchers (SPs) who have multiple starts in a week gain an outsized advantage by effectively doubling their points with a single player. To counteract this, we propose an IP limit as an optional, customizable rule. This adjustment would create a more competitive and engaging experience by preventing excessive point accumulation from starting pitchers and encouraging strategic decision-making. Here’s how it would improve gameplay:
1. Balanced Competition with Weekly IP Limits
Adding an IP limit would help level the playing field in weekly matchups. When managers rely on multiple-start pitchers to rack up points, they can often run away with the week by securing almost double points from a single slot. By setting a cap on innings, teams with strong pitching performances would still accumulate points but wouldn’t overshadow others by sheer volume alone. This rule also prevents owners from stockpiling and adding extra SPs solely for double starts. With an IP limit, teams must weigh the quality of each start more carefully, creating fairer outcomes across the board.
2. Strategic Pitcher Management
An IP limit introduces the need for strategic benching and starting decisions. Managers would have to consider not just who is pitching but when and how often. For example, if a team’s “ace” has a two-start week while another, less reliable SP has only one, the manager might choose to bench the latter to save innings for their top performer. This raises the stakes on lineup decisions and encourages thoughtful management, making for a more dynamic and enjoyable experience.
3. Flexibility to Add Players for Performance Gains
Under an IP limit, fantasy managers who encounter poor pitching performances early in the week could add pitchers to help make up ground. Teams struggling with ineffective starts won’t be disadvantaged further by a high-usage cap but can instead add pitching to strategically stay competitive. This flexibility allows managers to adapt to their pitchers’ performances, keeping every matchup within reach and competitive.
4. Remove the Need for Weekly Add Limits
Without an IP limit, weekly add limits are necessary to prevent streaming SPs for points. However, with an IP cap in place, add limits become less crucial since excessive starts won’t bypass the cap. Managers could shift their adds to support batters, addressing the common issue of unused bench slots for position players. In the current setup, these spots often go wasted, as managers use their bench slots for additional SPs to maximize points. An IP limit would encourage roster diversity and increase the value of having platoon players available, enhancing both lineup flexibility and enjoyment.
5. Encourage a Balanced Fantasy Baseball Experience
An IP limit not only promotes fairness and competitiveness but also provides managers with more control over their week-to-week strategies. By requiring thoughtfulness in both pitching and bench decisions, this rule rewards skill and engagement, rather than simply high-volume streaming. It gives every fantasy owner the opportunity to compete with their best lineups rather than simply outlasting opponents on quantity alone.
Summary
An optional IP limit, adjustable by commissioners, would add strategic depth and fairness to Yahoo’s head-to-head points leagues. It encourages calculated risk-taking, enhances bench utility, and removes the need for restrictive add limits. In short, it makes fantasy baseball more competitive and enjoyable by leveling the playing field while giving each manager meaningful control over their lineup decisions. We urge Yahoo to consider this feature for the upcoming season to offer a more balanced, strategic experience for fantasy baseball managers.
This proposal strives to meet the desires of managers who want a more thoughtful, competitive game without sacrificing the flexibility that makes fantasy baseball fun. By implementing an IP limit, Yahoo would elevate the fantasy experience, allowing all players to engage on an even playing field and create a more exciting season for everyone involved.