garrett wake
My feedback
-
32nd rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
31st rankedGathering feedback · 16 comments · Fantasy Football » Draft Issues · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →garrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
16th rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
14th rankedGathering feedback · 56 comments · Fantasy Football » Draft Issues · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →garrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
116th ranked
Thank you for this feedback. We will look into this further.
garrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
10th rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Please add this, and allow flexibility with this. Don't just implement it so that every week has to be a double header, or no week is a double header.
We'd like to have the same structure as the NFL, so 17 games -- some weeks would be double headers, and other's wouldn't.
This feature would pull many people from the more robust sites like MFL. Your interface is great, just get more options for your hardcore fans!
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
It's insane that another year has gone by, and none of the substantive changes asked for by the community have been added. Some of the top-10 have been asked for years ago. It's great to see Yahoo adding such important features as "BRING BACK SMACK TALK", and "LET ME HAVE A PICTURE BY MY NAME".
@JamesK,
After you've played in a private league for more than a few years you'll understand.
Both of the options you suggested are used heavily in public games, no real league uses either of them. Head-to-head is the preferred type of game of the two offered by Yahoo and most other sites. Allowing multiple games per week enables larger leagues (my 20 team league, for instance) to have a more realistic (closer to NFL 17 game) season, and thus a more accurate playoff bracket.
Your comments about what is "fair" are probably accurate, but what's "fair" isn't always FUN. Lets make things fun.
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
This topic needs to be merged, there are like 3 of these in the top 100
-
23rd rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
1st rankedGathering feedback · 360 comments · Fantasy Football » Playoffs · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
These forums are a joke.
WHATS NEW: GUESS WHAT GUYS -- WE'RE BRINGING BACK SMACK TALK AND CHANGING THE TEAM NAME LENGTH FROM 18 TO 20 CHARACTORS
THANKS FOR PLAYING ON YAHOO, WE'RE LISTENING!
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
The year, 2056. Cars hum through the air using anti-gravity technology developed less than a decade earlier. The average human life expectancy is 256 years, and only because most choose to die by ingesting a life-ending pill; the only thing not yet conquered is boredom.
Well, that, and Yahoo implementing any real substantive change to their fantasy football platform.
I really hope a competitor comes along one of these days and actually puts together reliable real-time stat tracking and a functional, robust and diverse platform.
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
GATHERING FEEDBACK
10 years later...
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
This idea has 3 posts within the top 50 and Yahoo hasn't merged them yet. It would probably be a top-5 idea.
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Yes please
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Nobody updates anything for Yahoo's fantasy football, it's a shame. Look at the "What's New!" list -- absolutely nothing that would take more than 5 minutes to implement.
"We got rid of O-ranking"... what? Who cares? That's what you spent your time updating?
Yahoo has an awesome interface, and that's about it. If sites like myfantasyleague could get an interface like Yahoo's interface, nobody would use Yahoo ever again. I hate to say this, but man, they put absolutely ZERO time into updating their platform. Very sad.
garrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
41st ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
There’s another top ranked comment with the exact same thing. Please merge them.
-
28th rankedGathering feedback · 17 comments · Fantasy Football » Scoring · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
There is a top 10 postvabout this and they should be merged
-
61st ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Glad this is being implemented and not more than 1 of the top 68 other recommendations.
Gathering Feedback Forever
-
43rd rankedGathering feedback · 10 comments · Fantasy Football » Playoffs · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →garrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
264th ranked
Hey Jared, any specific times and entry amounts you’re looking for?
Yahoo Product Support
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Hey Yahoo Admin.
Instead of requesting information on the 294th ranked idea, lets start implementing ideas that have been in the top 10 for years.
-
9th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Who cares about smack talk? Of the top 30 ideas on here, ONE is "Planned" (whatever that means... absolutely nothing I think).
The one in planning is adding a text box to the page. WHOO HOO. It looks like Yahoo spends about 1-hour worth of budget towards its fantasy football scripting per biennium.
-
17th rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
15th rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
3rd rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
8th rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
13th rankedgarrett wake
supported this idea
·
-
37th rankedGathering feedback · 34 comments · Fantasy Football » Scoring · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
JamesK,
After you've played in a private league for more than a few years you'll understand.
Both of the options you suggested are used heavily in public games, no real league uses either of them. Head-to-head is the preferred type of game of the two offered by Yahoo and most other sites. Allowing multiple games per week enables larger leagues (my 20 team league, for instance) to have a more realistic (closer to NFL 17 game) season, and thus a more accurate playoff bracket.
Your comments about what is "fair" are probably accurate, but what's "fair" isn't always FUN. Lets make things fun.
An error occurred while saving the comment garrett wake
commented
Can Yahoo please merge these topics, they would be ranked in the top 15 probably if they were merged.
garrett wake
supported this idea
·
Nobody knows about this site. I think some dev made it to help them out years ago and then forgot. You can't even find it without 20 minutes of searching.
Sad that "add smack talk" is higher than this. Not that any of these really matter.