Cricket Jones
My feedback
13 results found
-
7th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
1st ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
39th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
32nd ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
24th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
26th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
16th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
17th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
23rd ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
13th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
27th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
7th ranked
Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
-
8th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Cricket Jones supported this idea ·
I can see removing a person's posts if those posts contain filthy words (such as the "F" word) or images, but if someone is expressing an opinion, that runs counter to Yahoo's agenda than that should not be banned.
For example, I have seen Yahoo remove content because someone uses such words as "god", "fat", "black", "jesus", "alphabet", "LGBTQXYZABC", "monkey", "stupid", "mentally ill", "crazy", "white garbage" (more commonly known as trash) , "hillbilly", "thug", "gorilla", "pedophile", "ghetto trash", "re*tard", "scum bag" etc.
I don't see any of these words as being obscene, nor do I see them as being hateful. This is how people talk. This is everyday American English.