RC
My feedback
14 results found
-
10th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
supported this idea
·
-
1st ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Add Starting Pitcher Wins as a category.
Yahoo! already has Relief Wins as a categoryActually, Yahoo! should cover all the bases and add:
-Starting Pitcher Wins
-Starting Pitcher Wins + QS
-Wins + QSToday's game requires that we acknowledge Quality Starts because only the elite pitchers are allowed to pitch long enough in games to even qualify for a Quality Start. Many guys are qualifying for a win but not a QS, so our fantasy leagues should be given the scoring categories flexibility to adapt to the shifts in the real game.
I do like the idea of Wins + QS as a category but I'd want the ability to make it a Starting Pitcher specific category by removing relief wins from the equation. I'm all for leagues that want a basic Wins + QS but if Yahoo! can do that why not also do one that starting pitcher specific as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Add to the list-
Starting Pitcher Wins
RC
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Dee,
At least you got your topic to #1. Yahoo probably hopes that's enough of a win that you'll forget about your actual request just like they have. -
8th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Agree. Great point on ending season when you'd like and making a custom schedule. As you mentioned, since one week is such a **** shoot not only a two week championship would be great but my league would love to have a two week semifinal round as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Definitely.
RC
supported this idea
·
-
15th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
-
11th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
-
12th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
-
19th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
I like the idea. Last season we stared using the Continuous Waiver with a Free Agent Acquisition Budget, so we relied on bidding on players over the waiver priority. The waiver priority was still in effect as a tie-breaker for bids of equal amounts. We set our waiver processing to Everyday.
This reduced the number of "last guy up" scenarios but a waiver claim deadline set by the Commissioner could be a very useful tool for each league. -
9th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Agree. The more search filters the better.
RC
supported this idea
·
-
6th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
-
14th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
POLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
Bring back polling to message boards please.
Make the poll creator it's own section/reading pane on league homepage if you have to.
You've cluttered the league home page enough already, what's one more interface pane gonna hurt?An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
COM'ON YAHOO!!!!
Bring back polling. You've got, what assume, are brilliant people working for you. Find a way to make it work. Please.RC
supported this idea
·
-
7th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
-
13th rankedRC
supported this idea
·
-
5th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment RC
commented
I like the idea Kelly has. Sounds like a bit of an engineering project for yahoo but hey, what year is it anyway, cars are driving themselves so i think we prob have the capabilities to do three way fantasy baseball trades.
I think another way three way trades could be completed is if teams have to do the leg work on their own via email, in-game chatroom, text message, etc., to verbally agree on a trade. Once a verbal agreement is reached each manager involved will have to open their own multiteam trade request and detail each player's movement from original team to new team. The multi-team trade request from each manager must exactly match the requests of the other managers involved in order for the trade request to be made an official pending trade request at which point It is sent back to each of the managers involved to make sure there are no cold feet, they must make a final confirmation and then finally it gets sent for a vote to the league or commissioner or third party - however it is your league has chosen to evaluate trades - for finally approval or denial.
I'm no programmer but this seems like all yahoo would need to do is open up the ability for three or more teams to communicate at once through the trade function. We may not all have hoverboards, but *******, lets get some three way trades going for goodness sake because the future is now.RC
supported this idea
·
-
3rd rankedRC
supported this idea
·
Yahoo, It's the little things that often count in user experience. Like this suggestion. You can revamp the website layouts and colors and popup modules, but if the details and information displayed in those redesigns are ignored then all of your "redesign" work is time wasted.