K. S. Young
My feedback
16 results found
-
59th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
15th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
12th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
10th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
44th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
11th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
6th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
8th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
7th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
59th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
5th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
4th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
3rd ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
2nd ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
1st ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
-
9th ranked
K. S. Young supported this idea ·
By the same token, & maybe more impt ... ability to force a MAXIMUM # of players @ x position .... specifically in example - our 12 team league plays 2 team QBs (ie - KC QBS), and 2 DEFs .... which only leaves 6 unrostered team QBs or DEFs. We have a league rule that you can NOT have any QBs or DEFs on your bench (other than bye wks). On wks w/6 teams on bye, we need every one! Along the same lines, if they ever have a bye wk for >6 teams (it cud happen!!), it would be great for a commish to be able to let 2 teams use the same player in a position in their separate matchups.