Editorial content is better, but still needs help
I have noticed--and appreciate--the improvements in Yahoo! Finance over the past few months: more original content, better layout and organization. But there are still so many articles thinly disguised as editorial content, it's depressing and takes too much time to sort the wheat from chaff. I often end up going to Bloomberg or even the Wall Street Journal (ack.) Investor's Business Daily, for example, obviously pays you a ton of money to appear as a contributor on your site, but their material is SO repetitive, and if I hear what Cathy Woods is buying or selling one more time, I'm going to scream. Same with Smart Asset, Chaikan Analytics, and all of the other pay-to-play content providers (even Zacks) who simply hawk their wares day in and day out with very little true financial insight. Your audience is more sophisticated than these sources give us credit for. Please consider making Finance more like an unbiased news and information resource rather than a stew of advertorials and bogus investment advice (looking at you again, Chaikan analytics.) Thanks.
Steve Aldrich
shared this idea
