William Vance
My feedback
38 results found
-
134th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
655th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
178th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
165th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
518th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
82nd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment William Vance
supported this idea
·
-
518th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
425th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
655th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
393rd rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
518th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
518th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
322nd rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
48th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
655th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
966th rankedWilliam Vance
shared this idea
·
-
127th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
322nd rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
518th rankedWilliam Vance
supported this idea
·
-
655th rankedWilliam Vance
shared this idea
·
The new font being used is extremely difficult to read, finding stories is more difficult due to horizontal placement, and selecting a section such as "Politics" reveals stories unrelated to politics on a page too wide to fit on the screen, jumbled pictures and story headlines, spaced vertically at random -- it can't be explained other than "broken mess." There was absolutely nothing wrong with the format you had been using; consider reverting back to what worked and abandon changing simply for the sake of change.