Scoring - General feedback and requests
General feedback regarding scoring options and requests for new scoring options and categories. Some common category requests are:
- Goal Line Stops
- Penalty Yards
- Customizable Points Allowed Options
- Successful Onside Kicks
- Touchbacks for Kickers
- Dropped passes
- Forced Fumbles (D/STs)
- QB Hits (IDPs)

-
Kyle Clay commented
You already track it... each players ATOI can be viewed in the player pool. It's a great stat category to have to add value to good players, especially good D-men. Considering moving my league to ESPN because I know they have it.
-
Randall commented
This seems so pointless. How is this the 2nd ranked topic?!!
-
Colin Gutcher commented
The big one I am getting at is a composite goalie wins category (W + OTL) have 2 points for a win, and 1 point for a overtime loss or shootout loss. Its so frustrating watching your goalie go the distance only to lose in a 6 round shootout.
Other stats which would be nice: goalie scoring stats contributing to the regular scoring categories, Defensive scoring bonus, even strength stats (G/A/P/Shutouts/etc.), primary assists (or a composite cat).
-
cussy rucker commented
you are going super customization!
-
Brandon Eid commented
options should be customizable for scoring, but changes can only be made pre-draft. no scoring changes after draft, because it is not fair for everyone who joined and read the rules aka scoring system before joining your league
-
Anonymous commented
Would love to have the option for fractional points for field goals!
-
DubbleC commented
Hi, I would also like to see face-off percentage as a category or face-off plus/minus. Thank you.
-
DubbleC commented
Hi, I would also like to have shootout goals as a separate category. Thank you.
-
Steven Witczak commented
Please add FO = FW - FL as a scoring category in head-to-head leagues. This is an important statistic, as it indicates how many net possessions a player gains for his team on faceoffs.
Using only FW as a scoring category is insufficient, as it tells only half the story. Likewise, using faceoff win percentage as a scoring category is not ideal, since it is skewed by non-centers who may take only one or two faceoffs per game.
-
Anonymous commented
Been a year since this was suggested and we still only have basic scoring options. This should be totally customizable.
-
Claude Phillips commented
What is the purpose of having a player in the penalty box creating positive stats, when he is making his team play short handed?
-
Anonymous commented
Combine them as a category. You're the only platform left without this option.
-
Anonymous commented
take aways please
-
Matt commented
I would love the ability to change the scoring setup for different positions.
-
Tony commented
Wait where'd this random post come from about all these scoring by Grady. This was an entire thread based on FG kicking. Lets not lose site of that. His post should be somewhere entirely different.
-
Anonymous commented
One of the main things that differentiates defenseman from forwards is the amount of TOI that they put in. To make this work as a category it couldn't be cumulative for the whole week- rather you would take the top 10 (or top x amount) TOI performances from one team vs the top 10 (or x) TOI appearances of their opponent and add them against each other to decide the winner of the cat for the week (for H2H).
This would keep it from getting devalued through something like streaming or a weak schedule and I think it would be a way to add more value to time-eating defenseman that many people have been looking to do without the double-counting of the stats for forwards since the forwards with little exception aren't going to give the highest TOI performances over Defensive players in most lineups. -
Anonymous commented
A viable option. Next to the percent value I would still like to see the very valuable numbers of the actual won/total numbers my players got in sort of a grey kind of like they do with TOI so ie-
FO% 79 150/190
And some sort of minimum FO's to be taken that can be set by commissioners so a guy who flukes with 10/11 can't win the category without really competing in it. -
James Goode commented
I'd vote for this post if
Punters
were the only requested change. -
Andrew commented
Still "gathering feedback" over 2 years later? Let me help: people want this! I would love to have this along with the faceoff won/lost stats, and I think it makes perfect sense. If we have shots against, saves, and save % for goalies, we can add faceoff %.
-
TONY YACULLO commented
Basically it would be the same as 10yds = 1 point. With fractional scoring it'll be the same as RB and WR. So a 43 yd FG you would score 4.3 points