If you are going to ban people from posting at least let them know why? That broad brush you paint with doesn't tell us anything. I use same language and phrasing other people do as well as the article but I'm the only one being censored on the article. Posts I have made 3 or 4 months ago that have been up until just recently are just now being rejected. And those rejection I understand are being used to ban me from posting at all and not being able to view comments. As someone else said at least have the balls to admit you ban people for the mere fact they disagree with you.

Has anyone heard about the latest claims made by Senator Ted Cruz!? That the 'REAL' reason behind the 'SHUTDOWN' of Yahoo! Articles & Answers was a 'politically motivated' deviate intention by Silicon Valley billionaires to 'control elections' which of course is to ultimately 'seize' "WEALTH & POWER!" That the 'REAL' reason behind why Yahoo! Answers was 'NOT' archived was to keep it from being a reference as a possible influence on 'future elections!' The 'evidence' keeps pointing in the direction that our 'FREE SPEECH' is under 'SIEGE' & under 'ATTACK!' This is a 'CALL TO ACTION' to put 'FREE SPEECH' back on private sector entity platforms! 'WE THE PEOPLE' DEMAND AT ONCE we 'ratify' the 1st amendment to 'update' our constitutional 'RIGHTS' to 'FREE SPEECH' on platforms! Keep "over privileged special interests" 'OUT' of platforms & let's put 'FREE SPEECH' back 'where it belongs!' =<)

'We the people' hear Congress is proposing several bills that call for immediate comprehensive reform to overhaul Section 230 on platforms! It is to ensure platforms do 'NOT' overstep their ground by committing intentional arbitrary moderation 'ABUSE' to "legitimate" 'FREE SPEECH!' Yes, platforms have been 'granted the right' regulate "derogatory content" (hate, harassment, obscenity, misinformation & violence!) However these platforms are under VERY HIGH "suspicion" of committing "biased political viewpoint arbitrary moderation 'ABUSE' against 'fair & square' "legitimate" comments & opinions by users only expressing their 'FREE SPEECH!' Therefore let's agree with Congress to SIGN into LAW a bill like "Neutral Viewpoints for Political Free Expression & Diversity Act" to 'ENFORCE' our constitutional 1st amendment 'RIGHTS' to 'FREE SPEECH' on platforms! 'Words matter!' =<)

'We the people' HIGHLY believe the cowardly 'SHUTDOWN' of Yahoo! Articles & Answers was an act of "gerrymandering" to create a "politically biased" platform to 'SILENCE' our 'FREE SPEECH!' In reality 'we the people' want this kind of 'PLATFORM': "Preserve Liberty 1st Amendment Tradition of Freedoms & Oppose Retaliating Monopolies!" We believe it is time to SIGN into LAW a "Political Viewpoint Diversity Act" to overhaul & reform "biased" platforms & to put integrity, transparency & 'legitimate' FREE SPEECH back where it belongs! We HIGHLY believe we need to SIGN into LAW to make our 1st amendment 'Public & Private' LAW to ensure our 'FREE SPEECH!' Therefore we believe it is time to 'Repeal & Replace' current platform policies to favor more 'transparency, integrity, truth & justice' of our constitutional 1st amendment RIGHTS to FREE SPEECH on platforms! =<)

Didn't our forefathers back in the days of 1791 ordain by decree to SIGN into LAW our constitutional 1st amendment 'RIGHTS' to 'FREE SPEECH' was understood this would officially apply to 'public & private' domain!? Do we have to SIGN into LAW a 'NEW' article under the 1st amendment to proclaim & declare "Political Viewpoint Diversity" shall 'NOT' be 'deplatformed' just because the 'content' does not follow the "politically biased" 'rhetoric or narrative' of the "whiney platform!?" Yes, we do recognize policies that regulate other 'derogatory content!' However, it is said to favorably decree 'political viewpoints' should also be protected under our constitutional 1st amendment 'RIGHTS' to 'FREE SPEECH!' It is said 'private sector entity platforms' are 'NOT' elected officials & therefore 'LEGALLY' do 'NOT' have the 'right' to 'deny, censor, prohibit or abridge' anyone's 'legitimate' FREE SPEECH! =<)

Yes, we all know there are policies that regulate hate, harassment, obscenity, misinformation & violence on platforms. However when it comes to the rest of our "legitimate" 'FREE SPEECH' 'we the people' believe tech executives are actually 'NOT' "over privileged" elected officials! Who are 'NOT' properly qualified 'politicians, lawmakers or lobbyists' to regulate our "legitimate" 'FREE SPEECH!' If tech executives are "roll playing" government like "practice & policy making" then they should be subject to constitutional 'LAW' meaning our rightful 1st amendment 'RIGHTS' to 'FREE SPEECH' would actually be protected on platforms! Should we 'ENFORCE' antitrust laws to protect 'FREE SPEECH!?' We believe democrats & republicans would actually want bipartisan 'FREE SPEECH' on platforms! 'LET'S DO IT' SIGN into LAW to protect 'FREE SPEECH' on 'private sector entity platforms!' 'FIGHT FOR JUSTICE!' =<)

'We the people' HIGHLY believe the belief of this 'private sector entity' "free ride" 'BS' is just that...'BS!' These 'deviate intention' platforms think they can voluntarily 'self-regulate' themselves when in reality they put 'PROFIT' over people while they 'rig & manipulate' our 'FREE SPEECH' in the process! That's why we believe all this 'disorderly conduct' by these corporate 'COWARDS' are creating more 'adverse' atmosphere environment platforms! (Disgraced) Facebook is in the hot seat as 'PROOF' of 'disorderly conduct' to create an 'adverse' platform! Just because they have the right to 'moderate' "derogatory content" does 'NOT' grant them the right to "moderation ABUSE" of our 'rightful' (political discourse) FREE SPEECH! Therefore it is our 'patriotic duty' to SIGN into LAW new legislation to reestablish our constitutional 1st amendment 'RIGHTS' to our 'rightful' FREE SPEECH on platforms! =<)