Frank Crosina
My feedback
17 results found
-
2nd rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
25th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
For many of our leagues, we used the message boards to keep track of our prospect farm lists and the moves made regarding them. If you could remove the restrictions on NA roster spots, we would be able to keep those prospects right on our roster without freezing our moves if that prospect gets called up and loses their NA designation. Then we could use the new chat for recording farm moves and then could survive without the message boards. And individual commissioners could police the use of NA roster spots in their own leagues. Would it be possible to make this adjustment?
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Please add this function in Yahoo … my Commish has moved his leagues to Fantrax due to the message boards being removed with the idea that he could move back for next year, but now he is loving the minors spots on the roster and doesn’t need to keep posting it so he’s thinking about not moving back … please add either the minors spot OR make rhe NA spots have no restrictions so we can put whoever we want on them whether they are designated NA or not … then the Commishoners for each league can police them as they see fit 👍👍
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
We have a prospect/farm system and having a “Minors” roster spot would be awesome. But an easier fix would be to allow us to put any players on NA whether they are NA designated or not. If the roster freeze restrictions were lifted from the NA roster spots, we wouldn’t need the Message Boards which were recently taken away. Please make this change 👍
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
For many of our leagues, we used the message boards to keep track of our prospect farm lists and the moves made regarding them. If you could remove the restrictions on NA roster spots, we would be able to keep those prospects right on our roster without freezing our moves if that prospect gets called up and loses their NA designation. Then we could use the new chat for recording farm moves and then could survive without the message boards. And individual commissioners could police the use of NA roster spots in their own leagues. Would it be possible to make this adjustment?
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
18th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Please also add minors positions in Yahoo … my Commish has moved his leagues to Fantrax due to the message boards being removed with the idea that he could move back for next year, but now he is loving the minors spots on the roster and doesn’t need to keep posting it so he’s thinking about not moving back … please add either the minors spot OR make the NA spots have no restrictions so we can put whoever we want on them whether they are designated NA or not … then the Commissioners for each league can police them as they see fit 👍👍
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
2nd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Please also add minors positions in Yahoo … my Commish has moved his leagues to Fantrax due to the message boards being removed with the idea that he could move back for next year, but now he is loving the minors spots on the roster and doesn’t need to keep posting it so he’s thinking about not moving back … please add either the minors spot OR make the NA spots have no restrictions so we can put whoever we want on them whether they are designated NA or not … then the Commissioners for each league can police them as they see fit 👍👍
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
For many of our leagues, we used the message boards to keep track of our prospect farm lists and the moves made regarding them. If you could remove the restrictions on NA roster spots, we would be able to keep those prospects right on our roster without freezing our moves if that prospect gets called up and loses their NA designation. Then we could use the new chat for recording farm moves and then could survive without the message boards. And individual commissioners could police the use of NA roster spots in their own leagues. Would it be possible to make this adjustment?
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
For many of our leagues, we used the message boards to keep track of our prospect farm lists and the moves made regarding them. If you could remove the restrictions on NA roster spots, we would be able to keep those prospects right on our roster without freezing our moves if that prospect gets called up and loses their NA designation. Then we could use the new chat for recording farm moves and then could survive without the message boards. And individual commissioners could police the use of NA roster spots in their own leagues. Would it be possible to make this adjustment?
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Sent this one to Yahoo Feedback today:
For many of our leagues, we used the message boards to keep track of our prospect farm lists and the moves made regarding them. If you could remove the restrictions on NA roster spots, we would be able to keep those prospects right on our roster without freezing our moves if that prospect gets called up and loses their NA designation. Then we could use the new chat for recording farm moves and then could survive without the message boards. And individual commissioners could police the use of NA roster spots in their own leagues. Would it be possible to make this adjustment?
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
I have some leagues that have cancelled and moved to Fantrax. However, I think they would be able to come back and make a go of it with one added feature or change. We use our message board to track prospect adds, drops, and the lists for each team. If Yahoo could create a "minors" player designation where these player can be kept on each team's roster, that would be great. The other option is to make it so that the NA player designation has no restrictions and you can put whatever player on it that you like. The problem now is if you put a prospect with an NA designation on your NA roster spot and then they actually get called up to the majors, they lose that NA designation and thus freeze your roster moves. No NA restrictions would make it so the players would be on the individual team rosters and the commissioners could regulate proper use in their leagues and, as a result, make message boards not so essential. Hopefully you could make this minor upgrade and save a lot of leagues from leaving to other platforms.
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Some of the leagues I am in have moved to Fantrax, but I think they would come back if one change was made. We used the message boards to track adds, drops, and lists of prospects for our teams. If there was a player designation that allowed a team to keep these prospects on our roster, that would work. A designation like “minors” would make message boards not so essential. We could even use the NA designation if the roster changes restrictions were removed. Right now if you put a prospect on NA and they get called up and lose their NA designation, it freezes your roster changes. If it were possible to put any player on NA, regardless of their status and then allow commissioners to police the use of it in their leagues, that would work great. Please respond or let us know if that could be an option. Thanks.
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Come on! Been fighting off the 2 or 3 guys in our leagues that prefer Fantrax for a couple seasons, and now you’ve backed us into a corner. Can’t run our leagues without the message board. WTH are you doing over there? Are you trying to shut down Yahoo Fantasy Sports?? I don’t want to go to Fantrax, but our Commish has already said we have to go over unless you reconsider.
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
17th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Please also add minors positions in Yahoo … my Commish has moved his leagues to Fantrax due to the message boards being removed with the idea that he could move back for next year, but now he is loving the minors spots on the roster and doesn’t need to keep posting it so he’s thinking about not moving back … please add either the minors spot OR make the NA spots have no restrictions so we can put whoever we want on them whether they are designated NA or not … then the Commissioners for each league can police them as they see fit 👍👍
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Yes and add “Minors” roster spot so we could continue with our farm/prospect systems now that Message Boards are gone. Or allow us to put any player on NA regardless of whether they are NA designated or not. Then we could use NA to keep prospects right on our roster without freezing our player adds when a prospect is no longer designated as NA once called up to MLB. Please take a look at this option 👍
-
12th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Please also add a minors position … my Commish has moved his leagues to Fantrax due to the message boards being removed with the idea that he could move back for next year, but now he is loving the minors spots on the roster and doesn’t need to keep posting it so he’s thinking about not moving back … please add either the minors spot OR make the NA spots have no restrictions so we can put whoever we want on them whether they are designated NA or not … then the Commissioners for each league can police them as they see fit 👍👍
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
IL+ would be awesome, but we also need Minors roster spots to keep prospect or farm players. Or adjust the NA spots so that you could put any player in the NA spots regardless of the player’s designation. Please take restrictions that freeze roster moves off of the NA player positions and allow commissioners to police their usage in their leagues 👍
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
30th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Yes and add “Minors” roster spot so we could continue with our farm/prospect systems now that Message Boards are gone. Or allow us to put any player on NA regardless of whether they are NA designated or not. Then we could use NA to keep prospects right on our roster without freezing our player adds when a prospect is no longer designated as NA once called up to MLB. Please take a look at this option 👍
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
7th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
Yes and add “Minors” roster spot so we could continue with our farm/prospect systems now that Message Boards are gone. Or allow us to put any player on NA regardless of whether they are NA designated or not. Then we could use NA to keep prospects right on our roster without freezing our player adds when a prospect is no longer designated as NA once called up to MLB. Please take a look at this option 👍
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
41st ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Crosina
commented
For many of our leagues, we used the message boards to keep track of our prospect farm lists and the moves made regarding them. If you could remove the restrictions on NA roster spots, we would be able to keep those prospects right on our roster without freezing our moves if that prospect gets called up and loses their NA designation. Then we could use the new chat for recording farm moves and then could survive without the message boards. And individual commissioners could police the use of NA in their own leagues. Or you could create a Minors designation that does the same thing.
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
32nd rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
26th ranked
Hello, thank you for your feedback. We will look into getting this re-added in the future.
Frank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
14th rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
15th rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
11th rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
10th rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
8th rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
-
5th rankedFrank Crosina
supported this idea
·
I have to agree with most of the commenters ... the player page pop up now is not near as useful as it used to be. It doesn't show their past season stats and most importantly it doesn't show games played on any stats. Games played is important ... you compare two players and one had 46 points last season and the other guy had 68 points. But seeing that the one guy had 46 points in 44 games played makes a monumental difference! Also the old pop up use to have all their recent games listed. Please fix the new pop up ... it has almost zero information value.