Rosters/Designations - Option to lock players (including benched players) when their game begins.
This option, when turned on, will prevent managers from dropping players from their bench or IR slot when their game begins. Currently, you can drop any player from your non-starting roster, even if their game has started.
AdminProduct Support
(Admin, Yahoo)
shared this idea
-
Mike Caputo
commented
This is a great idea. If a player has already played this week, he should be locked and not be able to be dropped. Since fantasy football is a week to week game, players should be locked once their game has started. This will prevent any team trying to get a head start on picking up players for the following week. Currently my league uses the honor code and does not allow it, but it would be nice if yahoo had the option. Teams will have to use better roster management and make sure they have enough players at each position.
-
Adminjpaine
(Admin, Yahoo)
commented
Requests to allow commissioners to determine whether players should be locked on a manager's roster after their game has started, whether they're on the bench or not.
-
jeff alberini
commented
If a team has played, the players from that team should be locked and not be able to be dropped even if they are on your bench. It has happened several times this year, where teams were able to drop guys on teams that played at 1pm to pick someone up later. Oddly, if a player from the same team was on waivers, they would be locked. So, why can you drop a bench player of team that is currently playing or has already played? It makes no sense.
Good example: Let's say one your bench players gets hurt during their game you are watching. Why give the advantage to the manager for not starting a player. If the team is currently playing or has already played, those players on the bench or waivers should be locked. Instead, managers are rewarded for not playing someone. They see the injury and can cut them during the current game or even after the games. YAHOO is the one platform that does this.
-
Sammy Smith
commented
This needs to happen
-
Mark Musser
commented
I agree with this as well, I swear this was never possible prior to this year but I have one manager that does this often. Say the player played Thursday he has been able to drop them Sunday after seeing performance for another player that hasn't played yet and can start the new player.
Once a player has started their game they should be locked to the team just like starters are. -
John Haakenson
commented
Agree completely. Once a game starts any player whether in a line-up, on the bench or IR or a Free Agent is locked and cannot be added or dropped until Waivers is over after the MNF game.
-
Paul Gill
commented
Please enact this rule. I thought this was the rule previously, but seems to have changed this year. It provides an unfair advantage to those doing it. For example, a manger had a player on his bench who played on Thursday. But he can now drop that played on Friday-Sunday, if the player didn't perform well and can now pick up another player.
-
Mike Caputo
commented
Provide the option to lock players on the bench once their game has started. You should not be able to drop bench players after their game has started to pick up players who have not played yet. The starters are locked of course, but so should the bench players.
-
Chris Cipriano
commented
Please enact this. This has caused so many issues over the years in my leagues. Friendships have literally ended because of this
-
Tito Quintero
commented
Yes, this can easily be manipulated and opens itself to "legal" maneuvering. I call BS, remove it or at least give us the option to allow or not allow this in our own leagues.
-
Jason Crawford
commented
I fully agree with this please!!!!! The current setting is not good.
#fixit. If the team has played the players on the team are locked for the week -
Sam Albright
commented
When a player is on the bench and the game is going or has ended you can still drop the player a pick a new one that hasn’t played yet (hit waivers). This is a horrible rule. Make it like ESPN so the player is locked. This way a manager can’t play wheel of fortune and try to hit a breakout player before waivers hit. This defeats the purpose. I have seen managers drop a player from Thursday on their bench then pickup a player for Sunday 1pm then drop that player and pick up a 4:30p player and the. Drop and pick up an 8:30 player and so forth. It comprises the integrity of the game.
-
Michael Wonderlich
commented
We had a team drop a player who played on Thursday AFTER the game, but before the Sunday games. I thought that was not allowed. It shouldn't be allowed.
-
.... ....
commented
i disagree
-
Bryan Teagle
commented
Another vote.....Yahoo should not allow this as the DEFAULT setting.
It allows an owner to pick up the back up RB on the Thur Night Game and hold on to their bench.
If the Starter RB goes down with an injury, you keep the pickup.
If the starter doesn't get hurt......then drop and pick up a back up RB for a SUN 1pm game.
and so on, for the 4pm games, SNF, and MNF.So technically, an owner trying to take advantage of this bush league setting could get 5 stabs in the dark at a player. Just fix the default, Yahoo
-
Tomer Langer
commented
As of now, the default is that Yahoo will allow you to drop players on your bench even after their game has been played (and pickup any non-waiver players in the free agency pool). I'd love for there to be an option to turn this setting off or on based on league preference!
-
Derek Ivory
commented
This was an issue in my league as well. While I don't mind the ability to drop a player on your bench after his game has started, the corresponding 'Add' should not be available to be inserted into a starting spot until the following week.
The way it is set up now is essentially a loophole that allows for extended roster size.
-
Vincent
commented
I think not having this optionality allows for a sort of exploit that straddles the line of making the game equitable in terms of waivers/free agencies.
Example: Manager A fills a spot on his bench with a handcuff that's slated to play in the earliest Sunday games. After the game is nearly done, Manager A sees that the main RB has not been injured. He then cycles that roster position to a handcuff that's playing in the next slate of Sunday games and so forth. This 'strategy' allows for them to not really place value in a particular player but more of a hope to get increased value by getting a player before they hit waivers.
-
Vincent
commented
I think not having this optionality allows for a sort of exploit that straddles the line of making the game equitable in terms of waivers/free agencies.
Example: Manager A fills a spot on his bench with a handcuff that's slated to play in the earliest Sunday games. After the game is nearly done, Manager A sees that the main RB has not been injured. He then cycles that roster position to a handcuff that's playing in the next slate of Sunday games and so forth. This 'strategy' allows for them to not really place value in a particular player but more of a hope to get increased value by getting a player before they hit waivers.
-
Kevin Burbach
commented
Lol, so much butt hurt in this thread. How is it unfair if everyone can do it?