K
My feedback
20 results found
-
255th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
96th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
22nd ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
127th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
17th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
97th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
77th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
8th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K supported this idea ·
-
128th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
2nd ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
15th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
2nd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
Mercury News has a limit on the number of articles you can look at in 30 days without a subscription.
It seems to be independent of ad blocker.An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
The Miami Herald
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
The Washington Post. Request for "remove adblocker" or subscribe comes up on first article
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
ESPN links with their "insider" requirement. These are a subscriber only feature. You can only view the first 2-3 lines.
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
Dallas Morning News/Sportsday - you can go 2-3 articles before you get the "requires subscription" pop up
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
I'd be ok if they at least stated somewhere that "subscription is required" to let you know that you'll need a sub to read it.
K supported this idea ·
-
78th ranked
K shared this idea ·
-
34th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
I have to agree. Most of the articles are about as useless as Kardashian articles. I mean it can't be that hard to add in non-celebrity or non-op-ed articles. An article here/there about the royal family? ok ... I guess. but having 3-4 articles everyday is overkill, and makes the reader less interested.
K supported this idea ·
-
70th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
MSN removed comments a long time ago. Given the amountof spam on there and the level of toxicity, I'd consider it a site improvement (the articles themselves are a different issue)
K supported this idea ·
-
3rd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
Agreed. I've love to filter out Kardassians and the "Royal" stuff. (Few others on that list too, but if we knock them out, we'd see a major reduction in "news" stories.)
K supported this idea ·
-
96th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
Given the amount of spam, trolls, flame baiting, and more, (not to mention the occasionally phishing link) it's hard to feel that the feature is doing anything useful for the site and to have a "discussion" on the article.
In additon, by removing the comments, it's one less thing your staff would need to focus on/moderate, freeing up resources to do other stuff.
An error occurred while saving the comment K commented
Just remove comments all together from the Yahoo site
K supported this idea ·
-
5th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
46th ranked
K supported this idea ·
-
1st ranked
K supported this idea ·
Agreed. It's one thing when something "notable" happens ... but the level of coverage you might as well be reporting each time they go the bathroom.