How about give leagues a choice on Ohtani
Why not have 3 Ohtani's in the Yahoo Universe and allow individual leagues decide how they wish to deal with him?

Ohtani (Util & SP)
Ohtani (Util)
Ohtani (SP)

Individual leagues can decide whether there are two or one in their league. If leagues what one unified player then they can set their own rules that the other two can't be rostered. If for some reason leagues like having two separate Ohtani's they can make the unified one off limits on rosters.

This seems something Yahoo can do now without disrupting leagues that prefer having two separate ones.

Can someone from Yahoo actually address this issue?

I found this comment from yahoo last year when this subject was brought up. ...this is what they wrote.

We have added a column with the Opposing Pitcher in the My Team (Roster > Opponents) tab to provide insight into the matchup. Adding stats for a particular match-up is a tougher task, but we hope to add at some point this season.

Career batter vs pitcher stats have been added to players pages.

Thanks for your feedback and patience.
Yahoo Fantasy Sports

My comment is why take it down again? It was obviously a hot topic that many many wanted. You agreed, and added it back. Why not offer it again this season? Why mess with what the public wants???

That was literally the only reason my league still uses Yahoo! Fantasy Sports. The quality of the site is as sufficient as other sites, but where you guys really stood out was in the ability of the league to stay connected and banter with GIFs and Pics in the league message board. It really is not that difficult (I know that you know this), and as of right now I just code the image or gif in myself. The problem is that it is a hassle, and not everyone in my league knows how to do it. Please, please, please just bring the "post image" button back so we don''t have to consider moving sites next year. It will have to be voted on in league this season, so by the time you guys re-add it we will be gone, as will a lot of other leagues... I feel like your engineers haven't realized this yet; by removing something that people really like only to bring it back the next year like it was an "improvement" is not having the effect you think. People leave and don't come back, regardless of whether you bring back whatever it was that made them leave. I'm talking your hardcore supporters; the core guys who have been with you for a decade or longer (14 years for us I think). Don't do this to us, please. A simple button that does the img src= blah blah blah for us is all I ask. Seriously. If there are unseen issues, then lay out guidelines, that's fine. Just don't ruin what has always been a good thing, and the one aspect of your site that helps it stand out among the others.

This is a great tool... but allow the Commish total control.

1) Changes should automatically upload to be "draft" ready. Changing the draft type or time should NOT change or reset previous "Draft" editing.

2) Allow the commish to "fill" a draft selection without using a player. In other words, 1 player can take up more than one draft selection. Why? to "create" more value, bc some managers are willing to pay more than 1 selection for a player. Commish can also use this tool to "penalize" managers that do things that "hold the league *******".

3) Allow the draft to proceed with an uneven amount of picks. If someone trades 3 picks for 1 its bc they perceive "value". Don't penalize teams that have created a value with-in the draft.

There's a significant number of feature requests that would be resolved by allowing the maximum possible roster size to be 50 instead of 30. Allow commissioners to set this number and to determine the distribution of position types.

This would allow a commissioner to:
* Have 24 active positions, 6 BN (for leagues that want a Yahoo-traditional size roster).
* Have 13 active positions, 12 BN (for leagues that want a daily fantasy-sim type configuration with a 25 man roster, e.g. 8 position players, 1 SP, 4 RP)
* Have 25 active positions, 15 BN (for leagues wanting a 40-man roster)
* Have 25 active positions, 15 BN, 10 NA (for leagues wanting expanded minor league involvement)

The rationale I've seen for the 30 slot maximum has been to manage the player pool ***********. Yahoo shouldn't make this determination for every league; that is a decision that should be at the discretion of the individual leagues and commissioners.