Position Eligibility - 2022-23 Position Eligibility Requests
Requests for position eligibility updates for the 2022-23 Fantasy Football season.

-
Anonymous commented
Designate one position for player, no duel positions. Yahoo designates either QB or TE, not QB/TE. The leagues can setup flex positions if they choose, but the multiposition designated player can create some problems in 2QB leagues for example.
-
Todd Trevisan commented
Jets QB Chris Streveler should be QB/TE eligible like Hill.
-
Danny Berg commented
Jeff Driskel is not a Tight End in 2022. He has never actually recorded any career stats as a TE, including in 2021 when he was listed as a TE for a whopping 4 weeks. Yahoos own guidelines note eligibility is sourced from a data provider. If yahoo will not change the eligibility based on the comments. Can you disclose which data provider lists him as a TE? There is no other site I can find that has him as a TE. Thx
-
charles atkins commented
You guys can't watch the NFL or keep up with he easiest of stats not having Parsons with DE along with LB position. You wont even tell us how to make this happen.
-
charles atkins commented
How can you guys say you are doing your job and not have Parson listed as DE/LB?
You would even tell us "how" a player gets two positions in the first places. -
Scott Perysian commented
Can we add DE to Bradley Chubb’s eligible positions? Miami runs a 4-3 defense, and he will line up on the edge.
-
t t commented
Mike Williams injury status should be OUT after Chargers head coach Brandon Staley announced he will be out for "weeks"
-
Casey Herron commented
Any chance we can give Deebo Samuel an RB designation?
-
A C H commented
Taysom Hill should not have TE eligiblity. He never lines up at TE. Takes snaps and occasionally lines up out wide, but NEVER at TE.
-
G Lidin commented
I think that Taysom Hill needs to have his TE position removed, and be classified solely as a QB. Thanks!
-
Neeraj Gautama commented
Micah Parsons should have DE/LB designation. He has played edge most of the year.
-
Will Millar commented
Looking at week 5 Taysom Hill did zero plays as a TE, he did QB and RB plays only....this is not fair to the fantasy league. I am not allowed to play my RB at TE why should one team have that ability. He caught zero passes week 5 he was not a TE at all.
-
Angel Rodriquez commented
Mack is accurately listed as an EDGE on the Chargers depth chart, probably noting the hybrid D.
https://www.chargers.com/team/depth-chart
Obviously edge is not an official position, but is an LB/DE hybrid &: should be reflected as such.
This is the best explanation of why your metrics and designations on these
specific positions are incorrect and wildly inaccurate, depleting valuable players of the points they are best garnered to win at their position:https://dynastyleaguefootball.com/2019/04/15/make-pass-rushing-linebackers-fantasy-relevant/
Essentially, you are mislabeling the majority of edge players. By simply going with a defensive scheme designation, those labels are inaccurately robbing players of points. The problem is the fact that edge is not currently an official designation, but equally another additional problem is in the fact that you continue to evaluate defensive schemes, using only two categories, when in actuality many teams use hybrid schemes that do not fit into either compartment, this negating your entire evaluation of player designations completely.
Mack is just one example.
He is even noted, currently, as a DE on University of Buffalo's website:
https://www.ubbullrun.com/2022/5/17/23072695/bulls-in-the-pros-khalil-mack
"During his time with both the Raiders and Bears, Mack played in both a 4-3 and 3-4 defensive front."
He is an EDGE, that plays both DE & OLB in a HYBRID defense, that is typically 3-4, but also runs 4-3 & other variants.
An edge player is best described as a hybrid between a linebacker and DE position.
Currently, your point system and player designation system is the most wildly inaccurate of all the major fantasy football applications I have evaluated.
-
Ed Nolan commented
Hill is not a TE. Take your pick Yahoo, it's either a TE or a QB but it can't be both. Otherwise teams will in effect be able to start 2 QBs in a 1 QB league.
-
Ed Nolan commented
Taysom Hill is not a TE. This will throw off the competitive balance of every league.
-
Ed Nolan commented
Totally agree. This needs to be escalated asap!
-
Ed Nolan commented
Totally agree. This needs to be escalated asap!
-
Ed Nolan commented
Totally agree. This needs to be escalated asap!
-
Dustin Vogt commented
Khalil mack is an edge rusher he should be labeled as a DE/LB
-
Russ McDaniels commented
Taysom Hill should not be listed as a TE/QB... He only lines up as a QB. He does not line up and run routes or block as a traditional TE does. In a league that only starts 1 QB any team that is starting Taysom Hill, is having the advantage of playing with 2 QB's. If a team wants to start him, make them start him from the QB spot. The Saints drafted him as a QB, and re-signed him and gave him a large contract as a QB - NOT A TE